No, Red Cars Don’t Cost More To Insure

No, Red Cars Don’t Cost More To Insure

We’ve probably all heard this one at some point: if you have a red car, you’ll pay more for car insurance. Sure, certain cars are more expensive to insure, but colour has nothing to do with it.

Photo by Larry & Teddy Page.

Personally, I’ve heard this several times throughout my life, and the reasoning has varied from “red cars get pulled over more often” to “red cars are more likely to be involved in accidents.” As Insurance.com points out, this is all bull.

That doesn’t keep people from believing it, though. According to an Insure.com survey done last year, 46 per cent of 2,000 licensed drivers believed that red cars are more expensive to insure because they are pulled over more often.

Yet they’re doubly mistaken.

Not only does colour have nothing to do with car insurance rates, a particular model’s risk isn’t determined by the number of tickets its owners receive.

As one expert in the piece pointed out, you’re not even asked the colour of your car when you fill out an insurance quote. And while carriers do ask for your VIN, the colour of your car is not a factor in that code.

They have additional info at the link below.

Do red cars cost more to insure? [Insurance.com]


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

Here are the cheapest plans available for Australia’s most popular NBN speed tier.

At Lifehacker, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.

Comments


3 responses to “No, Red Cars Don’t Cost More To Insure”