What Drives Your Choice Of Wi-Fi Versus 3G?

ConnectToANetworkAt Lifehacker HQ, we’re all about wireless broadband as a solution for travellers. But sometimes a Wi-Fi network ends up looking like a better choice, even if you have to pay for it.

When you search for an Internet connection at a hotel, train station or other similar location, there’s normally a three-step process involved:

  1. Can I get onto a decent Wi-Fi network for free? (Our guide to finding free Wi-Fi can be very useful here.)
  2. Can I get a decent signal with my 3G service?
  3. Can I get a reasonable Wi-Fi deal without paying a fortune?

There can be other complicating factors (such as corporate policy or a desire for better security), but for most travellers, those are the three key questions.

I found myself at stage 3 recently: no free Wi-Fi available, sub-GPRS speeds on my dongle, and a non-free but not totally extortionate paid Wi-Fi network. With a bunch of work to get done, paying up was the only rational choice. Nonetheless, it felt a bit odd to be paying for a connection when 3G broadband was almost an option. But in the end, the need for speed beat the desire to save money.

Now I’m wondering: what would make you choose Wi-Fi over 3G broadband, or vice-versa? Share your approach in the comments.

The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

Here are the cheapest plans available for Australia’s most popular NBN speed tier.

At Lifehacker, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.


2 responses to “What Drives Your Choice Of Wi-Fi Versus 3G?”

Leave a Reply