
While syncing your latest album, movie, or apps over USB is pretty darn fast, there’s something to be said for the convenience of wireless sync. From anywhere in the house, you can just tap a button on your iPhone, iPod Touch or iPad to get them all sent to your device–without even having to get out of your chair. The only problem is speed. Wi-Fi is notoriously slower than wired connections, but we set out to see just how much slower — for music, movies, and apps — to see whether it was worth the waiting. Here’s what we found.
How We Tested
We ran these tests on a Windows desktop over 802.11g with a 4th generation iPod Touch. We ran three tests for each syncing medium: a music test in which we synced four albums of music, a music and movies test in which we synced those four albums plus a movie downloaded from the iTunes store and an apps test in which we synced seven apps from the App Store. We timed it from the pressing of the Sync button to the moment the Apple logo reappeared in iTunes’ playback bar, when the sync ended.
The Results: Wi-Fi Is Slower, But Usable for Music and Apps




Other Things to Consider
While music and movies take 13 times longer over Wi-Fi than over USB, it’s still a relatively short amount of time — 6.5 minutes for four albums isn’t bad. If you aren’t rushing out the door, it’s certainly worth the “not getting out of your chair” factor, and if you’re only syncing one or two albums, it’ll be even faster. This benefit grows with something like the iPad, which is more difficult to just keep docked at your computer all the time — instead of finding it and bringing it to your computer all the time, you can just hit the sync button on either device and let it go to town.
The other awesome thing about Wi-Fi syncing is that you can still use your device while you sync, which is awesome. If you want to sit in one room and listen to music on your iPod, or read your Instapaper queue on the iPad, you don’t need to sacrifice any of that time futzing with sync cables — just hit the sync button and keep on doing what you’re doing. A little sync icon will show up in the menu bar while it syncs and disappear when it’s done.
Lastly, there seems to be a misconception that your iPhone has to be charging for it to sync with iTunes over Wi-Fi. This is not true. You can sync when unplugged, as long as you have enough battery left in your phone and as long as iTunes is open. It will, however, automatically sync itself whenever you plug it in, which is a great feature.
Overall, Wi-Fi syncing is mostly what we expected — a slower version of USB syncing. However, if you’re syncing a small amount of media, it doesn’t make a huge difference, and if you’re syncing apps, there’s almost no reason to plug in at all. Also keep in mind that we were using a 802.11g network, and if you’re on the newer 802.11n, you might notice even faster Wi-Fi times. And with the ability to keep using your device while you sync, it is very freeing to have Wi-Fi sync around, as long as you don’t have anywhere to be. Have you tried Wi-Fi sync on iOS 5 yet? Share your thoughts with us in the comments.




















Matt
Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 3:43 PMI synced about 7 albums worth of music and about 500mb of apps over a 802.11n network in about 5 to 6 minutes. Pretty happy with that!
Jesse
Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 8:54 PMAm I missing something? Don’t you have to get out of your chair and go to your computer when you want to sync music and videos? Ie, tick an extra album on? What I’d love is the ability to choose what to sync remotely in a nice interface (rather than vnc or some such).
Otherwise, wireless syncing is nothing more than a backup and new podcasts for most people.
Aaron Toponce
Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 11:06 PM802.11g can allow speeds up to 54Mbps. USB 2.0 can allow for speeds up to 480Mbps. This is hardly shocking “news”.
JonBOY
Saturday, October 15, 2011 at 11:28 PMThe iPhone 4 and 4S both support 2.4Ghz wireless, so it would have been nice to see some comparative tests performed over a wireless N network also. An Apple airport extreme would have been quite appropriate.
Trav
Sunday, October 16, 2011 at 10:30 AMI put my phone on charge every night when i go to sleep and take it off when i wake, i’m pretty sure this is what they had in mind with wireless sync, as long as it syncs in less that 6 hours it’s ok with me. Any quicker than that do it the old fashion way
James
Sunday, October 16, 2011 at 4:01 PMFor some reason wifi sync isn’t working for me… I’ve tried turning off the local firewall and searching around, but can’t find which ports it uses etc.
Owen
Monday, October 17, 2011 at 6:49 AMWiFi sync is all very well and good, but it leaves your phone’s WiFi on even when the screen is turned off and it’s in your pocket. Not ideal for getting any kind of battery life out of it.
SB
Monday, October 17, 2011 at 1:04 PMActually, I’ve found my iPhone 4 battery lasts longer when I have WiFi on then when it’s off. The phone uses less power to receive push notifications etc via WiFi. I have WiFi at home and at work.
Andrew Garrett
Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 11:56 PMI think the main reason Wi-fi sync is so big is because of the “trickle” effect. That is, I don’t have to remember to plug my devices in to make sure they all have the latest data, the data just sort of trickles across between them whenever I plug them in for a charge.
Jonathan
Friday, October 21, 2011 at 3:54 PMiPad wifi sync is woeful. It spends probably 30 minutes ‘backing up’, even if I have done nothing significant on it since it was last plugged in. It’s nice that you cant still use it while syncing, but if I want to get my new music on it, I have no choice but to wait for the backup or plug it in via USB