Why You Didn't Get The Interview

Most of us have heard accounts of job seekers sending out 100, 200, perhaps 300 resumes without getting even one response. To anyone who has sent out large quantities of resumes without any response or interviews, I offer this advice: The complete lack of response is not due to the economy. It's based on your resume, your experience or the resume submission itself.Image via Payless Images (Shutterstock).

My intent here is to help and certainly not to offend, so if you are one of these people that has had a hard time finding new work, please view this as free advice mixed with a touch of tough love. I have read far too many comments lately from struggling job seekers casting blame for their lack of success in the search ("it wasn't a real job posting", "the manager wasn't a good judge of talent"), but now it's time to take a look inward on how you can maximise your success. I spoke to a person recently who had sent out over 100 resumes without getting more than two interviews, and I quickly discovered that the reasons for the failure were quite obvious to the trained eye (mine). There are candidates being interviewed for the jobs you are applying for (most of them anyway), and it's time to figure out why that interview isn't being given to you.

If you apply for a job and don't receive a response, there are only a few possibilities as to why that are within our control (please note the emphasis before commenting). Generally the problem is:

1. a mistake made during the resume submission itself 2. problems with the resume; 3. your experience

Qualified candidates that pay attention to these tips will see better results from their search efforts.

Your Resume Submission

Resumes to [email protected]: The problem here isn't that your resume or application was flawed, it's just that nobody has read it. Sending to [email protected] or [email protected] addresses is never ideal, and your resume may be funneled to a scoring system that scans it for certain buzzwords and rates it based on the absence, presence and frequency of these words. HRbot apocalypse… Solution: Do some research to see if you know anyone who works/worked at the company, even a friend of a friend, to submit the resume. Protip: Chances are the internal employee may even get a referral bonus. LinkedIn is a valuable tool for this. Working with an agency recruiter will also help here, as recruiters are typically sending your information directly to internal HR or hiring managers.

Follow instructions: If the job posting asks that you send a cover letter, resume and salary requirements, this request serves two purposes. First and most obviously, they actually want to see how well you write (cover letter), your experience (résumé), and the price tag (salary requirements). Second, they want to see if you are able and willing to follow instructions. Perhaps that is why the ad requested the documents in a specific format? Some companies are now consciously making the application process even a bit more complicated, which serves as both a test of your attention to detail and to gauge whether applicants are interested enough to take an extra step. Making it more difficult for candidates to apply should yield a qualified and engaged candidate pool, which is the desired result. Solution: Carefully read what the manager/recruiter is seeking and be sure to follow the directions exactly. Have a friend review your application before hitting send.

Spelling and grammar: Spelling errors are inexcusable on a resume today. Grammar is given much more leeway, but frequent grammatical errors are a killer. Solution: Have a friend or colleague read it for you, as it is much more difficult to edit your own material (trust me).

Price tag: As you would expect, if you provide a salary requirement that is well above the listed (or unlisted) range, you will not get a response. Conversely and counterintuitively, if you provide a salary requirement that is well below the range, you will also not get a response. Huh? Suppose you want to hire someone to put in a new kitchen, and you get three estimates. The first is 25K, the second is 20K and the third is 2K. Which one are you going to choose? It's hard to tell, but I'm pretty sure you aren't going to use the one that quoted you 2K. Companies want to hire candidates that are aware of market value and priced accordingly, and anyone asking for amounts well above market will not get any attention. Solution:Research the going rate for the job and be sure to manage your expectations based on market conditions. Another strategy is trying to delay providing salary information until mutual interest is established. If the company falls in love, the compensation expectation might hurt less. There is some risk of wasting time in interviews if you do not provide information early in the process, and most companies today will require the information before agreeing to an interview.

Canned application: By ‘canned' I am referring to job seekers that are obviously cutting and pasting content from previous cover letters instead of taking the time to try and personalise the content. Solution: Go to the hiring firm's website and find something specific and unique that makes you want to work for that company. Include that information in your submission. If you are using a template and just filling in the blanks ("I read your job posting on _____ and I am really excited to learn that your company _____ is hiring a ______"), delete the template now. If you aren't willing to invest even a few minutes into the application process, why should the company invest any time learning about you?

Too eager: If I receive a resume submission for a job posting and then get a second email from that candidate within 24 hours asking about the submission, I can be fairly sure that this is a bad omen. If I get a call on my mobile immediately after receiving the application ‘just to make sure it came through‘, you might as well just have the Psycho music playing in the background. Even if this candidate is qualified, there will probably be lots of hand-holding and coaching required to get this person hired. Reasonably qualified candidates with realistic expectations and an understanding of business acumen don't make this mistake. Solution: Have patience while waiting for a response to your resume, and be sure to give someone at least a couple/few days to respond. If you are clearly qualified for a position, you will get a reply when your resume hits the right desk. Pestering or questioning the ability of those that are processing your application is a guarantee that you will not be called in.

Your Resume

Your objective: If your objective states "Seeking a position as a Python developer in a stable corporate environment", don't expect a callback from the start-up company looking for a Ruby developer. This applies even if you are qualified for the job! Why doesn't the company want to talk to you if you are qualified? Because you clearly stated that you wanted to do something else. If you put in writing that you are seeking a specific job, that information must closely resemble the job to which you are applying.

Solution: You may choose to have multiple copies of your resume with multiple objectives, so you can customise the resume to the job (just be sure to remember which one you used so you bring the correct resume to the interview!). As there may be a range of positions you are both qualified and willing to take, using a ‘Profile' section that summarises your skills instead of an ‘Objective' is a safer alternative.

tl;dr: To any non-geek readers, this means ‘too long; didn't read‘. To my geek readers, many of you are guilty of this. I've written about this over and over again, but I still get seven page resumes from candidates. I have witnessed hiring managers respond to long-winded resumes with such gems as ‘if her resumes is this long, imagine how verbose her code will be‘. (Even for non-Java candidates! #rimshot) Hiring managers for jobs that require writing skills or even verbal communication can be extremely critical of tl;dr resumes. Solution: Keep it to two or three pages maximum. If you can't handle that, get professional help.

Buzzword bingo: This is a term that industry insiders use to refer to resumes that include a laundry list of acronyms and buzzwords. The goal is to either catch the eye of an automated search robot (or human) designed to rate resumes based on certain words, or to insinuate that the candidate actually has all the listed skills. Software engineers are probably more guilty of this than other professionals, as the inclusion of one particular skill can sometimes make the difference between your document being viewed by an actual human or not. When candidates list far too many skills buzzwords than would be reasonably possible for one person to actually know, you can be sure the recruiter or manager will pass based on credibility concerns. Solution: I advise candidates to limit the buzzwords on your resume to technologies, tools or concepts that you could discuss in an intelligent conversation. If you would not be comfortable answering questions about it in an interview, leave it off.

Your Experience

Gaping holes: If you have had one or more extended period of unemployment, hiring managers and recruiters may simply decide to pass on you instead of asking about the reasons why. Perhaps you took a sabbatical, went back to school full-time, or left on maternity leave. Don't assume that managers are going to play detective and figure out that the years associated with your Master's degree correspond to the two year gap in employment. Solution: Explain and justify any periods of unemployment on your resume with as much clarity as possible without going into too many personal details. Mentioning family leave is appropriate, but providing the medical diagnosis of your sick relative is not.

Job hopping: Some managers are very wary of candidates that have multiple employers over short periods of time. In the software world it tends to be common to make moves a bit more frequently than in some other professions, but there comes a point where it's one move too many and you may be viewed as a job hopper. The fear of hiring a job hopper has several roots. A manager may feel you are a low performer, a mercenary that always goes to the highest bidder, or that you may get bored after a short time and seek a new challenge. Companies are unwilling to invest in hires that appear to be temporary. Solution: If the moves were the result of mergers, acquisitions, layoffs or a change in company direction, be sure to note these conditions somewhere in the resume. Never use what could be viewed as potential derogatory information in the explanation. Clearly list if certain jobs were project/contract.

Listed experience is irrelevant/unrelated: This could be a symptom of simply being unqualified for the position, or it could be tied to an inability to detail what you actually do that is relevant to the listed job requirements. I would suspect that most of the aforementioned people (that received no responses to 100 submission) probably fall into the unqualified category, as job seekers tend to feel overconfident about being a fit for a wider range of positions than is realistic. Companies expect a very close fit during a buyer's market, and are willing to open up their hiring standards a bit when the playing field starts to level. Solution: Be sure to elaborate on all elements of your job that closely resemble the responsibilities listed in the posting. Instead of wasting time filling out applications for jobs that are clearly well out of reach, spend that time researching jobs that are a better match for you.

You are overqualified: The term ‘overqualified' seems to be overused by rejected applicants today, as there is no real stigma to the term. It's entirely comfortable for a candidate to say/think "I didn't get the job because I possess more skills at a higher level than the employer was seeking". When a company is seeking an intermediate level engineer, it isn't always because they want someone earlier in their career than a senior level engineer (although in some cases this could be true). Rather, they want the intermediate level engineer because that is what their budget dictates or they expect that senior engineers would not be challenged by the role (and therefore would leave). There are also situations where companies will not want to hire you because your experience is indicative that you will only be taking this job until something better comes along. A CEO applying for a job as a toll collector will not be taken seriously. Solution: Be sure that your résumé accurately represents your level of skill and experience. Inflating your credentials or job titles will always work against you.

Conclusion

The time you spend on your job search is valuable, so be sure to use it wisely. Invest additional effort on applications for jobs that you feel are a great fit, and go above and beyond to be sure your submission gets attention. As a general rule of thumb, you want to be sure that whoever receives your resume will get it into the hands of someone who has a similar job to the one you want, not just someone trained to look for buzzwords. Employees that have similar experience will be the best judges of your fit. If you aren't getting the response you want, do not keep using the same methods and expecting a different result.

Why You Didn't Get the Interview [Job Tips For Geeks]

Dave Fecak is an independent recruiter and consultant that specialises in working with software firms primarily in the Philadelphia area. Dave is also the founder/JUGmaster of the Philadelphia Area Java Users' Group. His blog is JobTipsForGeeks and he tweets at @jobtipsforgeeks.


Comments

    I'll stick with my four-pager, thank you. It's the technical breadth in my CV, as represented by the dozens of technologies I've worked with over my career, combined with results and accolades across that spectrum that communicates, "Fast learner; open to new things; can work anywhere from embedded to mobile dev and can do whatever tasks are required to make projects succeed in those environments; fights for wins like you wouldn't believe". I've tried a 2.5 page CV, and it just did not generate the results that the 4 pager did the last time I was looking.

    Your best bet is to know the preferences of the hiring manager and target accordingly, not to follow ANYONE's idea of the appropriate length of a CV. There are extremely well regarded tech job search experts in America right now who say that the 2 pager is outdated unless you're so new in the industry that that's all you've got. So really, there's no one right answer here.

      You didn't even read the article, did you? He repeatedly cited "tl;dr" as the reason you should keep it succinct. i.e. There is no point having a million really good things to say about yourself if no-one bothers reading it.

      I recently trimmed my resume to about one-third of what it was. I put my work history into a simple timeline graph and then gave my "Top 5 Career Highlights". I listed the software applications I use and my level of expertise with each, contact details for three referees and I put my contact details again at the end. If I hadn't designed it to look like a glossy brochure it would fit easily on one page.

    As an Employer we use Seek rather than Headhunters so we hover over the delete key. First thing I do is fire back a question to be answered. ( This stops scatter gun applications ) Then based on the email response I rank the following; Grammer, Spelling and lastly the answer to the question.

    That basically will get you in the door. I dont even read the CV till then.

      What industry is your employer in?

      Also: grammar and spelling? ;)

      *don't. ;)

      Oh my. Careful not to lose your job, you may struggle to get another.

    Key Word Search.

    Increasingly a computer or a 'low cost resource' does the first round of culling. If the job ad lists 4 skills/key words/tasks then make sure that your cover letter AND your CV has those EXACT words multiple times.

    Also, if there are 4 bullet points in the job ad, then your cover letter should have those bullet points and explain exactly why you fit those 4 bullet points. It is not rocket science - no one is going to trawl through pages of a CV to find some obscure reference to how you might have one of the key skills - spell it out to the 'low cost resource' exactly why fit the description.

    bahahhahaha low cost resource! A peon!

    I like the way you run this site. The visitor is encouraged to add his comments and moderation makes it possible to filter spammy comments.

    I find it strange and biased how HR people and hiring managers tend to blame applicants for their inability to land what they deem are the "right hires". If you're getting 200-300 responses and not getting any hits it is likely due to issues on YOUR side of the spectrum. These include; poorly written job descriptions, over-reliance on computer screen software like Taleo, unrealistic job expectations, and a general lack of knowledge by HR people themselves regarding the specific role and its requirements.

    For the most part, I've found that it's better to hire someone with great soft-skills plus high intellectual capabilities because those things can't easily be picked up. Everything else can be learned on the job so long as the employee has the right attitude and the hiring manager is willing to invest some time into training.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now