The Next G Townsville train torture test: how it worked in practice

The Next G Townsville train torture test: how it worked in practice

TrainRomaSt.jpg Telstra likes to boast about the coverage of its Next G broadband network, but it’s hard to come up with a practical, real-life way to test just how well that coverage works. Last week I travelled on a train from Brisbane to Townsville armed with a Next G USB modem, a notebook PC and (fortunately on a 24-hour trip) a power outlet in my sleeper cabin. Read on to find out how well the network stood up to the challenge.

took suggestions for testing regimes from readers

The good: coverage and connectivity

SignalStrengthLow.jpgWhile Next G wasn’t available throughout the entire trip (no big surprise), in practice it came pretty close. The longest I ever had to wait for signal to return was around five minutes, despite the sparsely populated nature of most of the areas I was travelling through. As I’ve mentioned above, variations in speed also weren’t obvious; if the connection was working, it was working well enough to access email, browse sites and use Ajax applications even when the claimed signal strength was low. While there were quite often brief dropouts, these generally restored themselves without requiring my intervention. As I noted in an earlier post, one particular surprise was how well YouTube worked particularly well, both for uploads and for video viewing. Other video viewing sites produced similar results, and I also got good speeds when downloading from Apple’s iTunes store, which often suffers speed degradation even on a proper network connection. Even Skype produced acceptable results.

The bad: software and pricing

MeaninglessBigPondError.jpg Many Web-based applications don’t cope well with the occasional brief drop-outs that are part and parcel of the 3G broadband experience. I was actually surprised this didn’t turn out to be more of a problem with YouTube; it certainly proved messy when using Movable Type. That isn’t a fault of the Next G network as such, but it is something to bear in mind if you largely work within your browser. My single biggest complaint is that the Next G client software is still fairly unstable. The longest dropout I suffered wasn’t because of a lack of signal, but because the software chucked a wobbly, necessitating closing it down and removing the modem before reconnecting. It was also rather slow to recognise when a connection had disappeared due to lack of signal; my first indication was usually when I couldn’t access a particular site, rather than the on-screen indicators for signal or network connection. On connecting it would often claim no card was inserted, but work the second time around, and sometimes it produced completely random error messages like the one pictured. The other issue to note is that Next G is expensive, but it’s easy to consume data. By 6pm on the first day, I’d already been through 500MB, doing pretty much what I would normally do — and that would have cost me at least $60 on Telstra’s current rates. I can’t fault the coverage, but it’s a shame that achieving that range comes at such a high cost. If you can afford it, it certainly delivers.


  • But was the speed 3G or did it drop to 2G or worse? I can’t believe the cost here in aus, in europe I could travel everywhere on the one account and it cost next to nothing. such is living with so few people in such a large place.

  • Good article showing how technically capable the Next G network is. I swear by it and its the only wireless network I recommend to my friends and clients.

    To bypass the buggy Bigpond software you might want to use a modem dialup connection, or better still if you’re using a Sierra Wireless device (such as 880U I think I saw in one of your links) you can use their watcher software which is vastly superior. But yes the Bigpond connection client does tend to get confused and requires a reboot on occasions.

    I make regular trips throughout various states averaging over 1000km each, and each time I have my laptop and 880U card sitting on the seat next to me. Whilst I certainly don’t get full coverage the whole way, I’m surprised at times when I do get it.

    Finally your 500MB costing $60 is only pay as you go, obviously with this usage pattern you would be on the 10GB for $129 plan, in this case the 500MB would have cost you around $7.

  • what are you on about not getting good speeds of the apple store. I get around 100KB’s off my 3 wireleess modem and around 600KB-1.2MB off my optus cable connection

  • I’ve had occasions when the store is speedy, and others where it has taken literally hours to download stuff, even on a wired connection – hence I was curious to see how it coped.

  • > It was also rather slow to recognise when a connection had
    > disappeared due to lack of signal

    You definitely DO NOT want a session connection to drop out if there is a briefish signal interruption (i.e going through an underpass, behind a hill with respect to the transmitter etc). etc etc. This is something which is *essentially different* to any sort of wired connection.

  • Did you try any https connections. While using the Telstra nextG network when stationary and logged into webmail via https, the browser would report an IP change and drop the secure connection.

  • I just came returned from a drive to Quirindi in NSW from the Gold Coast and it was a hopeless affair on my optus connection. Both phone and connection would only work in the major regional centers and not at all in between. I’d like to know how your experience to Townsville would have compared if you were using Optus….poorly I expect. Optus’s 1GB for $20 is enough for most of my needs but it really let me down on the trip. Strangely, I can’t connect at home or at work either as the signal is too poor.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!