When Cancer Screenings Aren’t Worth The Risk

Cancer is the worst. And, maybe thanks to Movember and pink consumer goods, we’re all extremely aware. Too aware. Because we’ve gotten it drilled into our heads to always get tested, patients are ignoring the risks of unnecessary cancer screenings, says the New York Times. Low-risk patients often get false positives, leading to dangerous and wasteful misapplications of radiation and chemotherapy.

Mammograms: Good, mostly. Photo by Andreas Rentz/Getty Images

Whose fault is it? Everyone’s. Doctors are afraid to get sued for missing a cancer diagnosis. The public are aware of cancer risks but not treatment risks. And, says the Times, insurance usually pays for the test, giving little personal incentive to skip it.

Screenings are obviously important, and low-risk patients do get cancer. But before you get tested, slow down and talk to your doctor about the risks and trade-offs.

With Cancer Screening, Better Safe Than Sorry? [NYT]


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

Here are the cheapest plans available for Australia’s most popular NBN speed tier.

At Lifehacker, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.

Comments


Leave a Reply