Why We’ve Stopped Buying Brand-Name Servers

Why We’ve Stopped Buying Brand-Name Servers

In an era where cloud computing is the new normal, (storm-driven outages aside), it’s no surprise that sales of traditional server hardware are declining. But it’s still slightly shocking to see how tough it is to turn a dollar in the server market these days.

The table below shows Gartner’s data on the market share for the five biggest server vendors in the first quarter of calendar 2016. It’s good news for two of the Chinese manufacturers, Huawei and Inspur, who have seen their market share increase. The more traditional players — HP Enterprise, Dell and Lenovo — have all declined, though their absolute market share remains much larger.

Company 1Q16 Shipments 1Q16 Market Share (%) 1Q15 Shipments 1Q15 Market Share (%) 1Q16-1Q15 Growth (%)
HPE 526,115 19.4 534,559 20 -1.6
Dell 464,292 17.1 507,433 19 -8.5
Lenovo 199,189 7.3 220,379 8.3 -9.6
Huawei 130,755 4.8 105,803 4 23.6
Inspur 109,390 4 91,847 3.4 19.1
Others 1,286,097 47.4 1,209,319 45.3 6.3
Total 2,715,838 100 2,669,340 100 1.7

The most notable trend, however, is the growth for “Others”, up from 45.3 per cent of the market in 2015 to 47.4 per cent. If that trend continues, we’ll soon see more than half the market going to unnamed brands.

What’s driving that shift? Gigantic cloud data centres for companies like Google, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services. Those use custom server hardware (and custom drives). Buying in bulk means driving a hard bargain on prices. Virtualisation has had a long-term effect on the sale of server hardware, though our appetite for virtual workloads has meant that servers haven’t disappeared completely.

“The real driver of global growth continues to be the hyperscale data centre segment,” Gartner analyst Jeffrey Hewitt said in a statement announcing the figures. “The enterprise and small or midsize business (SMB) segments remain relatively flat as end users in these segments accommodated their increased application requirements through virtualisation and considered cloud alternatives.”

For the server business, dominance isn’t an absolute necessity, but profitability is. That’s also a challenge. Global revenues from servers were down 2.3% in the first quarter compared to the previous year.

Company 1Q16 Revenue 1Q16 Market Share (%) 1Q15 Revenue 1Q15 Market Share (%) 1Q16-1Q15 Growth (%)
HPE 3,296,591,967 25.2 3,191,694,948 23.8 3.3
Dell 2,265,272,258 17.3 2,296,473,026 17.1 -1.4
IBM 1,270,901,371 9.7 1,887,939,141 14.1 -32.7
Lenovo 871,335,542 6.7 970,254,659 7.2 -10.2
Cisco 850,230,000 6.5 890,179,930 6.6 -4.5
Others 4,537,261,457 34.7 4,157,871,705 31 9.1
Total 13,091,592,596 100 13,394,413,410 100 -2.3

What’s interesting is that the dominance of Others in terms of volume doesn’t translate into dominance in revenue. The total Others category accounts for half of sales volume, but only a third of sales revenue. Conversely, HP Enterprise accounts for 20% of sales by volume, but 25% of sales by revenue.

For enterprise users, lower prices when they do need hardware and the option to use cloud when that isn’t a requirement sounds like a win/win. But make sure you review what you’re paying, because if you’re going with a “big brand”, the price might be on the high side.

Angus Kidman is editor-in-chief for comparison site finder.com.au , a former editor for Lifehacker Australia and a man who remembers when client/server was actually a thing. Follow him on Twitter @gusworldau.


  • When will businesses come to realise that ‘cloud computing’ is just smoke and mirrors and inherently unsafe?

    Angus, come back. We miss you!

    • I like how Huawei is on the up given that being Chinese state owned they were blocked from NBN contracts and all major US government contracts for security reasons.

  • It is interesting that they list others in the mix. More than likely the others machines are not able to be purchased by anyone other than the “Gigantic cloud data centres” and are more likely made to order.
    Would I build my companies systems on these no brand custom built machines, No, as more than likely you have to build your own monitoring systems, drivers and the likes to operating them. Costs a normal business would support.

  • Perhaps it is a case of those that purchased standardised “name brand” servers are the same people reducing their on-premise computing, and therefore just buying fewer servers.

Show more comments

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!