Piracy Site-Blocking Is (Still) A Waste Of Time

Piracy Site-Blocking Is (Still) A Waste Of Time
Image: iStock

Court-enforced online roadblocks, demanded by movie studios, appear to be stopping only half of Australia’s would-be pirates from reaching The Pirate Bay; even fewer once you allow for Aussies hiding behind a virtual private network, or VPN.

Australian internet service providers have blocked a range of piracy websites since December 2016, including The Pirate Bay and SolarMovie, after the Federal Court enforced site-blocking laws at the behest of a consortium of copyright holders headed by Village Roadshow.

Since then visits from Australia to these blocked sites have fallen by 53 per cent, according to the Australian Site-Blocking Efficacy Report from UK-based intellectual property research company Incopro.

The report “offers proof to all the naysayers who decried site-blocking,” Creative Content Australia executive director Lori Flekser tells Fairfax Media.

Flekser, responsible for the ongoing ‘Price of Piracy’ awareness campaign, views halving the traffic to these piracy sites as a win for Australian copyright holders, rather than dwelling on the fact that half of all would-be pirates still slip past the blocks. There are still hundreds of thousands of visits to piracy sites each month, not counting those behind VPNs.

“We believe that the research shows that site-blocking is effective, VPNs and all the other ways that people mask their activities notwithstanding, as there is clearly a move away from those pirate sites,” Flekser says, as the Federal government launches an inquiry into the effectiveness of site-blocking.

“I suspect that site-blocking would not exist in 42 countries around the world if it were totally ineffective.”

The figures look worse for copyright holders when you do allow for the fact that 20 per cent of Australia’s pirates use a VPN to hide their tracks when pirating content, according to Creative Content Australia’s own research.

Incopro’s figures rely on reports from web traffic analytics company Alexa, which attempts to trace the origin of website visitors. The report concedes that Alexa’s figures can not account for Australians who have masked their location using a VPN, bypassing site-blocking and appearing to be located in another country.

Those Australians which do show up in local piracy figures are mostly relying on proxy sites which bypass site-blocks without masking the visitor’s true location. The vast majority of this traffic is destined for The Pirate Bay, Flekser says, with Creative Content Australia calling on search giants like Google to do more to discourage the use of proxy sites.

While Flekser downplays the use of VPNs by Australian pirates, a 2015 study found that 16 per cent of Aussies had used a VPN. This was amid copyright holders pursuing Australian pirates who downloaded the movie Dallas Buyers Club.

The Dallas Buyers Club Court Decision Is Good News For Pirates - Here's Why

The makers of the Matthew McConaughey-starring movie Dallas Buyers Club have been dealt a blow in their attempt to extract payment from people alleged to have downloaded illegal copies in Australia. So what happens now?

Read more

VPN provider NordVPN says its Australian subscriber numbers doubled in 2016, and then doubled again in 2017. Along with efforts to mask piracy, a NordVPN spokesperson says the interest has been driven by privacy concerns over the introduction of Australia’s mandatory metadata retention scheme and talk of forcing communication providers to provide law enforcement access to encrypted messages.

Regardless, Flekser says VPN usage has not grown considerably in Australia.

“There seems to have been a spike in 2015, which may well have had something to do with the Dallas Buyers Club, but it’s very hard to actually know because once they’ve got a VPN they mask not only their identity but also their location,” she says.

“But if Google Analytics is any indication then it’s not a massive spike, and if our annual research is to be believed and is consistent then there doesn’t seem to be a big spike in the use of VPNs.”

Rather than accessing file-sharing sites like The Pirate Bay, Flekser says the number one reason Australians search on Google for VPNs is to bypass geo-blocking and access the US Netflix library, paying for content in US dollars.

These Australians are paying for content which is available for free via piracy websites, but Flekser disputes claims by Google and others that piracy is primarily an issue of “availability and pricing”.

“Our research has told us pretty consistently, for many years now, the key reason that people pirate is because it’s free,” Flekser says, “and it’s incredibly hard for any business model to compete with free.”

“We also need to help people understand that there are ways that they can legitimately consume content, some of them may involve paying, some of them may involve this bizarre concept called waiting.”

This article originally appeared in Digital Life, The Sydney Morning Herald’s home for everything technology. Follow Digital Life on Facebook and Twitter.


  • The reason some people pirate is because that’s where it’s available. “Oh it’s not on netflix or stan, or whatever. Oh the DVD rental places have all shutdown. JB Hifi aren’t selling it. Where can I get it?” The answer 9 times out of 10 is online.

    We keep saying make the content easier to get. Stop screwing Australians with ham-fisted licensing arrangements which see a season of a TV show available on Free to air, two seasons on Netflix, a season on Stan and another season just not available at all 🙁

  • I havent even noticed the TPB block to be honest. even the least computer literate person now know to just type tpb proxy instead of just tpb in google to get around it.

  • I wonder if those VPN stats count free VPN’s like Opera, Tunnel bear, cyber ghost, etc.
    Because if they don’t, their numbers are going to be way more off than they already seem to be. Especially if you consider:
    it’s incredibly hard for any business model to compete with free.

  • I am pirating Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop and I have no shame.

    I had been using Photoshop for 20 years (and paying it for it for 16 years), and Lightroom since day one, and always paying for it too until early 2017.

    Now, after Adobe literally locked my photos in their catalogue system, they want me to start paying a monthly subscription instead of letting me buying the software whenever I can see the benefit of doing so.

    They are within their rights to take advantage of customers like this to increase their profit. Likewise I have no regrets to pirate the software, at least until I find an alternative that I can live with and I can easily transfer my catalogue too without loosing my edits.

  • Anything they try to do is a waste of time.

    The only way to solve piracy is to make stuff more affordable, Easier to consume and on time.

    Trying to punish people for pirating is only making it harder for them to detect piracy. The entertainment industry is just making it harder for them with this hardline approach. We dont need to change, The Entertainment industry needs to change

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!