It’s Official: Aussie Petrol Sucks

It’s Official: Aussie Petrol Sucks
Image: iStock

According to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) figures, Australian petrol is the worst of all 35 OECD countries. Aussie standards allow for 150 parts per million (ppm) of sulphur – the stuff that, once it hits the atmosphere, can form acid rain and also cause respiratory issues for anyone who likes breathing. It’s been 15 years since we last revisited the standards in our fuel – it’s time we took another look.

Producing fuel with 150ppm of sulphur makes it cheaper to produce petrol, thereby keeping prices down, although it’s hard to tell what the benefit is given prices at the pump are nudging $1.50 at the moment. That’s for 91RON fuels which are pegged at a maximum of 50ppm in other OECD countries. The more expensive 95RON and 98RON fuels, which allow for 50ppm, are dirtier than the equivalents in other countries which set the limits for those files at 10ppm according to a report at Wheels.

One solution cited by the Wheels article would be to make the dirtier 91RON fuel more expensive than the 95RON fuel, thereby creating a price trigger to entice drivers to use cleaner fuel – kind of a “polluter’s tax”.

It’s also important to note that about three-quarters of our car imports come from Europe or European-designed vehicles that are made for fuels that are of a cleaner standard than our 91RON petrol.

As we continue to look for ways to do better than the previous generation when it comes to pumping crap into the atmosphere, it seems one thing we can do is use cleaner fuel. That’s going to hurt the hip pocket – I fill my car with 98RON and regularly pay close to $0.20 per litre more than the cheapest fuel at the bowser – but I like the idea that my kids and grandkids might have a slightly better chance of being able to breathe the air they live in.

Of course, the entire discussion could become moot if we eventually abandon petrol-fuelled vehicles and move to electric vehicles. Then we’ll only have the electricity generation business to fight with over emissions.


  • Meh, petrol is a dying fuel and good riddance too. Electric is the new frontier and the sooner it is made mandatory for all car manufacturers to drop the petrol engine in favour of electric the better.

    • Is there even enough lithium on earth to make all cars electric?

      Even so, the number of cars on the road is not going to disappear anytime soon and they still all use petrol.

      • Sure, petrol may be king for the immediate future, but its demise is certain and the sooner the better. There are quite a number of new technologies coming up that could easily reduce or even replace Lithium in batteries.

  • not really sure on the validity of this. Premium fuels have less sulfur because they have far more pure additives and less junk in them. I will actually call petrol companies and racq to see what they say. this is very interesting to me. as I have been deliberately using 95 RON fuel for this very reason it is a cleaner fuel.

      • In my car – a 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulietta – I can get better than 1000km from a full tank of 98 on the highway. I’ve never run this car, or the Alfa I had before this one, on anything but 98 so I don’t have a control experiment but I’m happy with the mileage and reduced pollutants.

  • Because fuel isnt already expensive enough?
    Maybe Australia should promote more “green” technologies and remove the Luxury car tax from Electric vehicles like the Tesla Model S. Allowing more Australians access to cleaner cars.

  • ULP 91 is full of sulfur. 150ppm of it. 95/98 are 50ppm & diesel is 10ppm of sulfur. Currently, ULP 91 is expected to be phased out before the end of 2018. Why the government even want to contemplate keeping it is beyond me. Europe had the regular stuff from 1988 when unleaded was introduced there up until 1992 when 91 ULP was phased out. Time to really update both fuel quality & emissions standards.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!