Don’t Walk And Text Unless You Want To Be In The Way

Don’t Walk And Text Unless You Want To Be In The Way
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, hacks and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Lifehacker Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a fix.

Walking through a crowded street, you can’t help but notice the people paying more attention to the phone in front of their face than the fast-approaching dog poop on the footpath.

Image credit: Quinn Dombrowski/Flickr

In a PLOS One study, researchers from Anglia Ruskin University found that people moved more slowly and took longer to avoid obstacles when using their smartphone during a walk. The more in-depth the interaction, the slower people walked.

The Privacy Enthusiast's Guide To Using An iPhone

Your privacy is important, and now more than ever, it seems like everyone is trying to put eyes on your personal data. That might include advertisers, governments or some weird voyeur in your life. The good news is you can do a few things to your iPhone to make it more secure and privacy friendly without ruining the experience.

Read more

To test the theory, researchers built a path with two obstacles: A foam board to walk over, and a step-up box to step on and over. Participants were outfitted with eye-tracking equipment and motion sensors. They walked the path multiple times without their phone, while talking on their phone, while reading a text message, and while replying to one.

Participants writing on their phones not only had a shorter gait than their phone-free counterparts, they walked a lot slower. Trials where participants typed on their smartphone took 68 per cent longer than trials without a phone. What’s more, researchers found participants writing while walking lifted their feet higher and more slowly to avoid obstacles, 38 per cent slower than trials without a phone.

The adaptations in gait when negotiating the surface height change were consistent with participants adopting an increasingly cautious stepping strategy which may serve to reduce the risk of tripping / falling.

Adopting a more lackadaisical stroll might help you stay on your feet and give you more time to scan your surroundings, but the evidence isn’t concrete. No one participating in the study fell, and the study doesn’t provide direct evidence that mobile phone use increased pedestrian related accidents.

Researchers did posit that pedestrian-related accidents could be attributed to “tasks that require greater attentional demands and thus provide a greater demand on working memory; such as…crossing the road when you are required to attend to oncoming hazards (fellow pedestrians or cars) travelling at different velocities or when the phone interaction is increasingly demanding i.e. a particularly engaging/important conversation”. In short, put your phone away when crossing the street.

It makes sense, considering the uptick in pedestrian accidents. In 2010, “over 1,500 pedestrians visited hospitals in the US due to tripping, falling or walking into something” when using their smartphone.

If you’re going to get involved in some serious texting, just step to the side, knock one out, and keep it moving. Not only will you get it done faster, you’ll avoid walking into the middle of the damn street.


  • Not too sure why this needed its own study (maybe a study on why there are so many pointless studies is needed?) as its pretty obvious if you concentrating on a particular item like a phone in your hand, it impedes your ability to correctly function in other tasks such as walking in a strait line (or stop at traffic lights LOL!).

    Try walk down George st in Syd/town hall around 5PM and count the number of times people run into you or swerve in front of you because they are mindlessly walking in a vague direction while looking at their phone, its gold watching them try and take on stairs without visibility only left to ponder why that was a terrible life choice afterwards.
    There is no cure for stupidity

Show more comments

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!