Australia Needs More Kerbside NBN Connections

The latest complaints about the National Broadband Network (NBN), including concerns about slow download speeds and frequent dropouts, show that all is not well with the NBN.

A recent report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) also flags Australia’s broadband speeds as among the worst in the OECD, beating only Mexico, Chile and Greece in terms of internet speed and penetration. This raises questions on NBN’s continued use of fibre to the node (FTTN) over a large proportion of the total NBN footprint.

When the coalition government came to power in 2013, it instructed a new NBN management team to stop rolling out fibre to the premises (FTTP) and instead build a multi-technology-mix (MTM) version of the NBN.

But, as predicted, it is becoming clear that the FTTN component of the network is inadequate for Australia’s future needs.

Who’s to blame?

NBN chief executive Bill Morrow has deflected some of the blame for low speeds away from NBN and onto retailers, suggesting that their networks might not be up to the task.

He has correctly pointed that part of the problem is that many customers are opting for cheaper, slower services rather than the more costly faster ones.

In defence of its network, NBN points out that existing slow-speed ADSL services dominate the speed data quoted in the OECD report. It suggests that rolling out the NBN out across the entire country will help to improve Australia’s broadband ranking.

But this argument ignores any future developments in other OECD countries. There are numerous broadband initiatives in the OECD, and many of these initiatives use FTTP networks, which offer much higher speeds than FTTN.

Faster speeds overseas

Worldwide, the proportion of fixed broadband services using FTTP has increased by 77% in the past year and those using copper, such as FTTN, have decreased by 11.6%.

While the OECD and the rest of the world are moving forward with ramped-up FTTP deployments, Australia is moving backwards with its continuing rollout of FTTN.

New Zealand, for example, currently sits three places ahead of Australia in the OECD report. But in New Zealand, the telco and internet provider Chorus is installing FTTP around the country.

It announced in September last year gigabit-per-second services across its fibre footprint, starting at a wholesale price of NZ$60 (A$55) per month. This follows the announcement of gigabit services in Dunedin in 2015.

In Spain, more than one-third of customers have access to FTTP and this fraction is growing. A similar surge in FTTP connections is taking place in France.

In the United States, fibre rollouts are expanding, and countries such as Sweden and Finland already have a large penetration of fibre in their networks. Many countries in Southeast Asia either have rolled out, or are rolling out, high-speed FTTP networks.

One of the reasons why FTTP deployments are expanding worldwide is that newer construction techniques and cabling technologies are driving down the cost of FTTP.

Enter Fibre to the Curb (FTTC)

NBN Co announced last September that it will roll out Fibre to the Curb (FTTC) to around 700,000 premises originally slated to use an upgraded version of the Optus HFC network.

FTTC is a relatively new technology in which fibres link the local telephone exchange to small existing pits in the street, outside a home or business. FTTC potentially provides speeds in excess of 500 Megabits per second.

Up to the pit, FTTC is essentially the same as a FTTP. The key difference is that in FTTC, a small waterproof electronic box in the pit connects the fibre to the existing copper wires that run into the home.

But FTTC is largely untested in large deployments such as Australia’s NBN. So a rollout of FTTC will carry a degree of technological risk.

NBN says it will cost about A$2,800 to roll out FTTC to each premises, which is only $630 more than FTTN. Like FTTP, the cost of rolling out FTTC will decrease over time using newer construction techniques. FTTC and FTTP are both becoming more cost competitive.

With speeds as much as ten times higher than FTTN, FTTC has the potential to improve Australia’s rankings in broadband speeds and accelerate Australia’s transition into the digital economy. These were the original objectives of the NBN.

In a blog post, NBN’s chief network engineering officer, Peter Ryan, says that FTTC and FTTN are closely related, and uses this premise to paint a picture of how easy it will be to upgrade from FTTN to FTTC.

But FTTC has a natural relationship to FTTP and not to FTTN. In FTTN, fibres feed a cabinet on the side of a road that is connected to nearby 240-volt power lines. The power supplies backup batteries and banks of electronics that connect to the premises via the existing copper wires.

In FTTC (and FTTP, for that matter) the expensive powered node is not needed, meaning that the cabinets in the street could have to be trashed when FTTN is upgraded.

In an attempt to bolster its arguments for FTTN, NBN has asserted that those cabinets are “an extremely valuable asset … which can be used for a range of purposes”. But it is very hard to imagine what these purposes could be.

Taking stock

Despite the excitement over FTTC, it’s getting harder to cancel contracts for FTTN and move to a more sensible strategy.

Ryan points out it’s not possible to “tear up 18 months” of FTTN planning as that would only delay some connections for two to three years.

The NBN network is like an enormously long train; you can’t just bring things to a complete stop and change direction, it just doesn’t work that way and never will.


The Conversation

Rod Tucker, Laureate Emeritus Professor, University of Melbourne

This article was originally published on The Conversation.


Comments

    I really cannot understand NBN. My suburb isn't scheduled until 2019, at that stage the majority of the suburb is getting FTTdp, the estate I live in is getting FTTN. I asked NBN why my estate is getting FTTN while the majority is getting FTTdp. They just ask, are you in the same suburb! Really the only reason I asked then about it was why my estate which is in the same suburb and at a date 2 years in the future deploy, the whole suburb should be getting FTTdp!

    All I can say is that they love to make up shit!

    He has correctly pointed that part of the problem is that many customers are opting for cheaper, slower services rather than the more costly faster ones.

    He incorrectly pointed that out. No-one talks about the customers that would gleefully opt for a faster more expensive service if the technology could carry it.

    I want 100/40 and I would happily pay for 100/40 except I'm over 850 meters from the node and the best I can get is 30 megabit. Why would I pay for 100 or even 50 when they can't physically provide it. Instead I end up paying for 25 and this tosser uses me as a statistic to demonstrate no-one wants faster speed. No you wanker, I want it, you can't provide it.

    I would blame Turnbull and the LNP for all of this. They are dirty that the NBN was Labors idea and that's why they made it FraudBand.

    While the rest of the world gets 1,000Mbps FTTP at a reasonable price I get slugged with almost $200.00Pm for 100Mbps FTTE. That's right the nearest node to my house is at my local exchange 2 suburbs away! This was confirmed when speaking to NBNco regarding the slower speeds I'm getting regardless of the obscene price I'm paying.

    So my 100Mbps download is really 79Mbps and my 40mbps upload is really 34mbps. Turnbull and the LNP just want to destroy the NBN because it was Labors Idea as the LNP does not have any foresight whatsoever, and only cares about keeping their own corrupt jobs, rather than bringing Australia out of the Dark ages and into the modern world.

    Turnbull claimed under his (mis)management of the NBN it would be faster, cheaper and have a quicker rollout. In reality it is slower, much much more expensive and most of Australia is STILL waiting for it. and in a few generations time, most of Australia will STILL be waiting for it!

    He started this farce as communications minister before stabbing Abbott in the back (after the LNP carried on about labors leadership issues) and now is steamrolling us to make it even more expensive and slower and to delay the rollout as long as possible. (then will blame Labor for all of their ****ups, as the LNP always does)

    Once again us citizens are pawns in the childish, immature political games.

    At least I get a free VPN as my fixed line is in Gunn NT even though I'm in Adelaide SA. and those connected to my Wi-Fi are in Alice Springs. but the downside of that is extreme ping (over 100ms) making online gaming impossible due to excessive rubberbanding. Now and then they get my IP right for a short time and I get a 2ms ping.

    It does not last long and my IP changes again and the ping goes up. I am paying extra for a static I.P. too btw.

    NBN really stands for National BullS*** Network.

    Last edited 19/03/17 3:50 pm

    Does anyone know how I can get the copper wires replaced from the pit outside my house back to the node? The wires are over 40 years old. My isp (iinet ) is no help and neither is the tio. I might have to set up fttn on our secondary line and cancel my connection if I can't get my failing repaired.

    I know someone that has a FTTN connection where the node is 1.3Km away. She was signed up by Telstra to a 25 Mbit plan even thought the max modem sync rate is 12.6 Mbit. Now that is what I call a clever county. Bill Morrow and Malcolm Turnbull either trilogies or liers.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now