Think Again Before You Post Online Those Pics Of Your Kids

Think Again Before You Post Online Those Pics Of Your Kids

You might think it’s cute to snap a photo of your toddler running around in a playground or having a temper tantrum, and then posting it on social media. But did you ever think it might be a mistake, or even illegal?

The French government earlier this year warned parents to stop posting images of their children on social media networks.

Under France’s rigorous privacy laws, parents could face penalties of up to a year in prison and a fine of €45,000 (A$64,500) if convicted of publicising intimate details of their children without their consent.

This new legality is powerful food for thought for parenting in the Facebook era. As adults, we often express dissatisfaction at the ways young people post their lives online. But if we turn the mirror on ourselves, do we as parents actually have the right to make our family photos public? If so, which ones?

Sharing pictures

Part of the issue is our tendency for over-sharing. A recent study by Nominet, which handles the UK’s .uk domain name registry, found that parents post nearly 200 photos of their under fives online every year.

This means that a child will feature in around 1,000 online photos before their fifth birthday. We’ve even got to the point where if you don’t upload photos of our baby, others question whether you are a committed parent.

This new norm means that many children will have a powerful digital identity created by someone else. This process can be likened to the manufacturing of celebrity identities, where parents can potentially shape the public persona of their child in any way they want: child genius, disobedient, fashionista, fussy eater and so on.

How do you think your own mum or dad might shape your online identity? Do you think it would be an accurate portrayal of who you are?

There is also the issue of Likes and comments on those photos. Without realising it, are we choosing to upload posts about our kids that we hope will get the most audience attention? If so, how is this skewing the identity we are shaping for them?

The web never forgets

We often tell our kids that once something is on the internet it is there forever, and this is a core concern for kids. Research shows that parents often haven’t considered the potential reach and the longevity of the digital information that they’re sharing about their child.

Your child won’t have much control over where that home video of her having an embarrassing first singing lesson ends up or who sees it.

And for this generation of kids, the publicising of their lives can start even before they are born when parents broadcast photos to all their friends and their friends’ friends of the antenatal scan.

Parents’ actions are generally not maliciously intended. In fact, they actually often see they are exposing something personal about their own life in such posts rather than that of their child.

There’s also benefit from such sharing. Posts about your child bed-wetting might help a friend find solutions, or boost their patience for dealing with a similar issue with their own child. Many parents find this community of support important.

Given the relative youth of social media, it’s hard to say exactly how growing up online could affect children’s privacy, safety and security. But social media has also been around long enough now (Facebook is now 14 years old) that it’s important to seriously consider the issue.

It’s time to question how individuals (both children and adults) should manage boundaries around sharing personal information, and how they can control information that is shared about them.

Posting embarrassing photos of others on Facebook without consent is definitely tricky territory, but what constitutes embarrassing is slightly different for everyone, which makes this new issue even more of a minefield.

Get the kids involved

The answer of how to approach this new-found issue might be to listen to what kids have to say about it. Recent research from the University of Michigan asked children and parents to describe the rules they thought families should follow related to technology.

Adults tend to think of these rules around how much time kids spend on screen, but about three times more children than parents thought there should be rules about what parents share and don’t share on social media. Many kids said parents should not post anything about them on online without asking them.

Both children and parents considered positive images, events and news more appropriate to share than negative ones. An image of the child playing on the swings at the park is a lot less likely to resurface than a YouTube video of them having a tantrum because their breakfast is not in their favourite bowl.

If you’re a parent looking for advice or sympathy about a behavioural problem, then a community approach is still very helpful, just don’t post an image and your child’s name as part of the post. This will help to limit the searchability and reach of it.

Asking your children’s consent is also part of the issue and part of the solution. Asking if your child likes the photos of them and whether you can put it up online can be a very quick and respectful conversation. It also sets up a great approach to your kids understanding digital etiquette.

Parents sharing photos of their kids online isn’t only about digital identity. It’s also about our obsession with taking photos of our kids, particularly when they shine (or don’t shine) in their respective activities.

This can make kids feel pressured to perform to help mum and dad get the right snap to share. What the children really want to see is you taking notice of them and acknowledging that they and their actions are important.

The Conversation

Joanne Orlando, Researcher: Technology and Learning, Western Sydney University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.


  • “This means that a child will feature in around 1,000 online photos before their fifth birthday.”

    Another disappointing article from The Conversation that is half baked. Of the parents who setup web sites for their kids, on average they will have 1000 online photos of their children on that site before their fifth birthday.

    Thank you for posting this article. Despite quite a few flaws (like the one I mentioned), it reminds me just how different pockets of society can be. I do not associate with any hardcore Facebook users, and if I do, they never mention it. I am not aware of pressure to post kids’ photos online. What a bizarre cultural custom. Is it possible that this represents the niche of the hairdressing salon gossip of days gone by rather than a broad social phenomenon?

    I like the idea that a family discusses sharing photos (even the ones with grandparents via post) because it bonds families and gives kids some involvement in decision making.

    If you don’t use social networking, some of the advice in this article still applies about giving your kids choice and having family based discussions.

    If you’re using Facebook, you and your family privacy is obviously worth little to you. However, the wider you disseminate photos with names, the more you leave yourself and your kids exposed to all sorts of scams and threats. Telemarketers and house thieves are but a few examples. It makes it easy to build lists of names of family members, friends and what you look like. Locking down your profile limits your exposure to those willing to pay money to access your information (which is a mixed blessing for some people).

    While you are talking to your kids, you might also want to discuss the pros and cons of social networking. Permanent records, synthetic friendships, agencies and individuals who mine Facebook for power and profit. I haven’t listed any positives because they aren’t jumping out at me as I try to think of them. Ego boosting maybe? Getting online votes from friends may give warm fuzzies to some people? Numbers of online friends equals popularity and social success?

    When I think of this article, I can’t help but think of Edward Scissor Hands. The scenes in the salon were very entertaining.

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!