Why Google’s Pixel Is The Anti-iPhone

Why Google’s Pixel Is The Anti-iPhone

This week we got our first (official) look at Google’s new Pixel smartphones, and predictably much of the discussion has been around how they stack up to or “challenge” Apple’s iPhones, and whether they’re really Google’s “first ever” phones or just Nexus devices by another name. While the Pixel has some obvious physical similarities to the iPhone, and while there were some playful jokes at Apple’s expense during Google’s presentation (free online storage, headphone jack etc), it’s not necessarily accurate to say the big G is “taking the fight” to Apple by attempting to make an iPhone of its own. The devices are similar in that their hardware and software are created by one company, but if anything Google is trying to make the anti-iPhone.

In a year when Apple has released a phone very similar to last year’s phone (which was itself a minor upgrade to the phone we saw the year before that), Google wants to push the idea that it’s releasing something new.
[related title=”More Stories on Google Pixel” tag=”Pixel” items=”3″]
The very appeal of an iPhone is its ubiquity and familiarity, with new software arriving across the entire platform at once and new hardware adding faster or better versions of what came before.

Meanwhile the Pixel is stepping out from the rest of the Android ecosystem to act as a proving ground for all sorts of Google stuff that isn’t found elsewhere (yet), like Daydream VR, Google Assistant and live screen-sharing customer support, as well and recent Google apps like Allo and Duo, which are built in.

Even the name, Pixel, promotes this newness, being the only flagship phone name I can think of without a number or other model indicator at the end of it.

No, I don’t think Apple has to feel too worried or challenged by the Pixel. They are very different devices for consumers that want very different things. Existing makers of Android smartphones, however, could have reason to start sweating.

Previously, the only phones to get the big Google stamp of approval have been Nexus branded. These were solid, accessible devices that set a baseline for the Android experience. Clean, competent and always up-to-date, Nexus phones carried the names of their manufacturers (like HTC, Huawei or LG), but ran a version of Android untouched by phone-makers or telcos.

With Pixel, not only has Google aimed significantly higher with its hardware spec, but it’s offering an “opinionated” twist on its own Android software. Pixel runs Android 7.1, but it isn’t the 7.1 that Samsung, Sony and others are working to integrate into their devices.

In addition to the blue light filter, Dream VR mode and various tweaks in the vanilla version of 7.1, Pixel packs customisations including Google Assistant integration throughout, a new launcher that works like an evolution of Google Now, the unlimited and automatic ability to back up and restore videos and pictures in full resolution, built-in chat support and a smart storage solution that backs up old files to the cloud to save space. The look and feel of the software is also custom and unique to Pixel.

By designing its own hardware and putting its own unique twist on vanilla Android, Google is placing its own device in direct competition to other Android flagships. And although some of the features will likely become available to others (Google Assistant seems like a no-brainer), the Pixel could offer a nice alternative for those tired of waiting for their telco or handset maker to integrate Google’s latest and greatest.

This article originally appeared on The Sydney Morning Herald


  • This still doesn’t mean anything to me. It’s got a bit of customisation. How does that make an anti-phone? The price seems to be the main anomaly. It’s far too expensive.
    Samsung already customise Android. If you don’t like Apple or Samsung, this may work for you. However, people like my wife will refuse to pay the 3x increase for the Nexus -> Pixel crossgrade. I can envisage no benefit for many other people who will also reject the cost difference.
    My wife has already asked me to research the next Nexus alternative. Software upgrade reliability, timeliness and longevity are key. “Get an Apple iPhone” is looking to be my lazy answer to my wife’s question because the fragmentation of Google product is frustrating. Staying with Google is like whack-a-mole. But, the bureaucracy of iTunes might be a deal breaker. Getting anything on/off an iPhone is not a simple cut & paste. It’s painful compared to Android.
    Not happy Jan!

  • Well basically if you hate Apple you really don’ have much choice now do you, This or some other Android phone or what else? MS has dropped the Lumia line, so….. Basically I’d rather use a 10 eur disposable phone than any Apple shit ware.

Comments are closed.

Log in to comment on this story!