Hi Lifehacker, I’ve been working as a contractor to my current boss for the past three months. He has offered to employ me full-time, which gives me all the benefits of holidays and so on and less hassle with invoices and budgeting, but that would result in a pay cut of roughly 20%.
He’s offered to pay for further education in the industry on top of any licences needed for software, as well as a renegotiation of my salary every six months. Is the pay cut worth the stable and steady income?
Contract picture from Shutterstock
Switching from being a contractor to being a full-time employee often involves negotiation over appropriate pay levels. This isn’t necessarily unfair; there are costs involved with full-time employees (such as leave loading and superannuation) which aren’t required with all contractors. The higher rates you’re paid as a contractor cover the fact that you’ll typically be responsible for those expenses yourself.
Whether you need to want to make the switch in part depends on how in-demand your skills are. If you were scoring work steadily from other employers before this contract, switching to a full-time role may be less beneficial. If the industry is more unpredictable, it could be a worthwhile choice.
Given that your boss has suggested there will be a salary review in six months, it’s a relatively low-risk move: essentially, you’re only committing to a six-month contract at worst. However, make sure that you have a written commitment to both the salary review and to training being provided. If those are purely verbal promises, they’re easier to renege on.
Got your own question you want to put to Lifehacker? Send it using our [contact text=”contact form”].