Dear Lifehacker, I'm in the market for a new phone, and I want to get something with a nice display. Do I really need something with 1080p? That seems like a lot for just a 5-inch screen, but everyone seems to be advertising it. Sincerely, High-Def Curiosity
If 1080p in a phone sounds like a lot, that's because it is. When the first iPhone with a "retina display" came out, it packed a 3.5-inch screen with a resolution of 960x640, giving it 326 pixels per inch (or ppi). Notably, when Apple increased the physical size of the iPhone to four inches, it also increased the resolution to 1136x640, which is still 326ppi. In most cases, 300ppi or so exceeds what the human eye is able to distinguish at a normal viewing distance (which is what Apple's "retina" is supposed to refer to).
A 1080p phone, on the other hand, has an insane amount of pixels in comparison. In a 5-inch phone, a display of 1920x1080 has a whopping density of 440ppi. If you go down to, say a 4.7-inch phone like the HTC One, you reach 468ppi. That's a resolution that's about 50 per cent higher than what most human eyes can readily distinguish under normal usage. You can probably see pixels if you squint really close, but is there any real benefit to going up this high?
High Resolution Displays Use More Battery Power
It's impossible to add more pixels to a device without needing power to run them. Some types of panels like AMOLED only light up pixels as they're needed, which means you can conserve some power by using darker themes, but LCD displays will light them all up no matter what, which requires more juice. Not only to physically turn them on but also run the processor to account for the added complexity (which we'll come back to in a bit).
Just how much extra power does it take? Well, when Apple released the third-generation iPad with "retina" (here defined as 264ppi), it came with a whopping 11,666mAh battery, which was 70 per cent larger than the battery in the previous generation. However, it still only promised the same 10 hours of use. Why? Well, it would be oversimplifying to say it's solely because of the new display, but it's also correct to say that doubling the pixel density over the previous tablet (132ppi for the iPad 2) would require a significant increase in power consumption.
You can somewhat see this reflected in Android phones as well. While Android phones vary wildly in battery size, the ones that last the longest are also typically the ones with the biggest batteries. LaptopMag rated the LG G2 as the Android phone with the best battery life around. It also carries a 3000mAh battery. Comparatively, the Moto X has a 720p display with 2200mAh battery. Both phones will run a full day (and the G2 can actually run longer than that), but larger batteries don't make phones more efficient. They're more akin to Hummers with large tanks than a fuel-efficient hybrid.
High-Resolution Displays Use More Processing Power
While powering all those pixels will have a direct effect on battery life, they'll have to go through some processing power on the way. How much is difficult to gauge since there are so many factors that affect performance and efficiency in software. However, as one independent game developer explained to us, increasing the number of pixels in a display will always tax the GPU more:
These higher res screens tax fragment shaders (which do the processing for each pixel) on the GPU more. That means you get worse battery life for the same GPU/battery because for all applications more pixels need to be processed. It also means that in anything that actually gets near the limits of the hardware you have (primarily games), you're going to hit those limits much more quickly. Especially because, in games, the fragment shaders are, the vast majority of the time, going to be the primary bottleneck.
In most cases, we accept this trade-off because things look nicer. However, since the human eye can't tell much of a difference between a 300ppi+ display and a 400ppi+ display, the extra processing power needed to run those pixels is mostly wasted. Ironically, having a higher resolution display can result in worse-looking graphics purely because the GPU is wasting time on rendering more raw pixels (that you probably can't see), instead of allowing developers to use those resources on adding more elements or details (like the advanced particle systems, lighting effects, and texture mapping you see in advanced AAA games).
High Resolution Displays Are Good for CJK Characters (Maybe)
There are, however, a few benefits to having a high resolution display -- like CJK characters. If you haven't heard of CJK characters, then this benefit doesn't apply to you. CJK stands for Chinese, Japanese or Korean characters. Unlike the Latin-based alphabet that consists of a small collection of a couple dozen or so distinct symbols that create words based on combinations, CJK symbols can be distinct words on their own and potentially bear striking similarities to different words.
The question of whether or not super high-resolution displays actually aid in reading CJK characters is, as with anything, highly subjective. However, text is one of the first things to become illegible at low-resolutions, and CJK characters are considerably more complex than Latin ones.
Keep in mind that while it's true in an overwhelming majority of cases that pixel density exceeding 300 is overkill, it depends heavily on how good your eyesight is and how far away you view your device. You probably don't normally look at your phone three inches away from your face, but, if you do, 300ppi might not be enough.
If you have a need to read text using CJK characters, your best bet is to just look at a phone with a 1080p display yourself, hold it the way you normally hold your phone, and see how it feels for you. However, if you stick with Latin-based characters, it's equally likely that trying to distinguish between two screens will just result in your brain playing tricks on you.
Ultimately, your phone choice is up to you, and none of them are particularly bad. However, the higher the pixel density, the more questionable the benefit is. Even if you feel a tangible benefit to a 1080p display in a 5=inch phone, it won't stop there. LG, for example, recently showed off a 5.5-inch display with a mind-boggling 538ppi. Arguments about viewing distances, special characters and "retina" definitions aside, there's an upper limit for phone displays and we're straddling that line now. Chances are that battery life and performance should be a much higher priority for most consumers.
Got your own question you want to put to Lifehacker? Send it using our contact form.