Dear Lifehacker, With the release of iOS 7, I have noticed that the 4th-generation iPod Touch is not supported for this upgrade. This was only discontinued in May this year, and I am quite disappointed that support for such a recent device has been stopped. Under Australian consumer law, am I able to return the device based on the expectation that it would be supported for a longer period of time? Thanks, Touch Annoyed
Picture: Getty Images
Our golden rule when it comes to refunds (and service) is that it never hurts to ask. However, in this case we suspect that you're not going to get very far, unfortunately. It's annoying that the fourth-generation iPod touch won't be able to be upgraded (my own main iOS device is one of these), but it doesn't really constitute grounds for a refund.
The problem is that you would be asking for money back for a device that still performs all the tasks it was capable of performing when you purchased it. It isn't defective; it just can't do new things. Unless you have specifically signed up for a service that includes contracted regular updates, it's going to be hard to argue that you would not have purchased it knowing that -- especially if you didn't explicitly state that to a salesperson at the time of purchase.
As well, you're seeking a refund based on the notion that a device first released in September 2010 (and which has itself been succeeded by a new model) should still be receiving regular software updates in September 2013. In the world of mobile operating systems, three years is a very long time.
As well, there are plenty of precedents for Apple cutting off OS updates for older models. The original iPad, for instance, came out roughly six months before the 4th-generation iPod touch, but it wasn't able to upgrade to iOS 6. So it wouldn't be accurate to claim that Apple always makes updates available for all older models (even though that perception seems to be quite widespread)
Australian consumer law doesn't have anything specific to say about how long products should operate for in a given category, but is based on "reasonable expectations". It doesn't seem entirely reasonable to me to demand a refund for an older model simply because you now can't run a new OS on it.
Having said all that, the "it never hurts to ask" rule comes into play. Even if you can't score a refund (and I suspect you can't), you might be able to swing a discount or a trade-in on a new model. What your experience reinforces is that if you buy an older piece of technology because it's cheaper, you need to remember that support and upgrades may not be on offer for as long.
Got your own question you want to put to Lifehacker? Send it using our contact form.