There is nothing more frustrating than listening to people haggle over different definitions of what constitutes “work”. Catty conversations about who’s working harder, who’s working smarter, or who’s not working at all are more about judging others than solving inefficiencies.
I’d like to steer you away from this all-or-nothing dialogue (“I work all the time and you never work”) to a more robust conversation about what work really is. And, in the process, help you to appreciate not only your own unique working style, but also the working style of others on your team. As my thinking has developed over the years, and after perusing many, many personality tests, I believe that there are four basic working styles: Doing; Leading;Loving; and Learning.
The best teams have a balance of all four styles. And the best organisations have many well-balanced teams who are confident in their working style and understand the necessity of divergent types or work. So, what’s your style?
Doing
Doers execute. They come alive when tasks are complete, lists are checked, or projects are tackled. They typically have intense focus and are detailed in their efforts.
Doers are usually so focused, however, they may forget to look up and communicate what they’re doing. Doers also tend to dive into work with little forethought. They believe that everyone should “Shoot, Fire, Aim” and tend to devalue the important work of planning.
Leading
Leaders create the vision and inspire others to believe in it. You can’t help but listen to, admire, and follow the Leaders. Without Leaders, we would be spinning in a hamster wheel with no real vision.
Leaders can be detached from others, not completely understanding all that goes into executing their vision. Because they’re out in front, they sometimes forget to check in with the people following them.
Loving
Lovers are relationship-builders. Believing that we’re stronger together, they thrive in harmony and work hard to manage relationships and build consensus. People strong in the Loving working style are sensitive and empathic. They have an unconscious finger on the pulse of every other person on the team. If you want to know how others on your team are really feeling, ask the Lover.
But Lovers can suck at follow through and more detail-oriented work. Left to their own devices, they can out-empathise anyone and make people feel great, but not provide “tangible” work.
Learning
Learners are the researchers. These engineer types love learning and meticulously understanding the nuances of a problem. They are deliberate, disciplined, and tend to think more strategically than most people.
Without others, however, Learners wouldn’t get much done. In order to execute their best-laid plans, they need a team ready to act. Their strategy is only as good as the problems they actually solve — not in theory, but in reality.
Theologian Howard Thurman says: “Don’t ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive.”
So, let’s get over the notion that all work looks one way. It does not. Nor should it. You need many people doing many things to accomplish many goals. Everyone has unique strengths that become super-charged once they’re aligned with other people’s strengths. Rather than critique someone who you believe “isn’t working,” make sure you’re living out your unique contribution in a powerful and sustainable way. Just do what makes you come alive.
4 Unique Working Styles: What’s Yours? [Inc.]
Dr. Shelley Prevost is a co-founder of Lamp Post Group, a venture incubator in Chattanooga, Tennessee. She curates kick-ass cultures by infusing principles of positive psychology in her role as Director of Happiness. @thegladlab
Comments
One response to “Work More Efficiently By Identifying Your Unique Working Style”
I dont personally believe that these stereotyping approaches are an effective method to achieve any realistic goals..
As you say, it’s YOUR UNIQUE working style. Personally – I think i exhibit all of these qualities within certain circumstances where each is appropriate.
I doubt the point of this article is to pidgeonhole anyone. Everyone will identify to some degree with each of these work approaches. The ‘unique’ part is how they mix within any one individual’s work habits. I’m task oriented, a bit of a leader but also enjoy research, for example. Where’s the Loving? I’ll do some research…