Five Best Alternative File Copiers

Five Best Alternative File Copiers

If you do any serious file copying on a Windows system, you’ll quickly discover that there are substantial limitations to the default file copier. Ease your file copying frustrations with these five alternative copiers.

Photo by NathonFromDeVryEET.

Copying a few documents from your hard drive to your flash drive doesn’t stress out the default copier too much. If you’re dumping gigabytes of data from one drive to another, however, you’ll quickly find that the default copier is sluggish and unreliable. The pinnacle of frustration: When Microsoft’s default copier putters out while you’re transferring tons of files and you’re left with no indication what was copied and what wasn’t, leaving you to pick through the file lists on each end or starting from scratch to ensure a clean copy. The five excellent alternatives below all succeed at alleviating the many shortcomings of the default copier.

FastCopy (Windows, Free)

FastCopy isn’t pretty, but it is, as the name implies, quite speedy. FastCopy integrates with the system shell and is the only copier listed here which allows you to select which individual commands will appear on the right-click context menu. FastCopy allows you to specify actions based on a file’s age, size and name, among others. You can also enable secure overwrite, where all moved files are securely deleted from the source directory upon completion of the move. FastCopy can be made portable by copying the FastCopy.exe and FastCopy.chm from the installation directory.

RichCopy (Windows, Free)

RichCopy has been around since 2001 but was only recently released to the public; prior to that it had been an internal Microsoft tool. RichCopy offers all the functionality of the popular command line file copier, RoboCopy, but it’s wrapped in a radically more user friendly GUI. RichCopy has a single but significant shortcoming: It lacks integration into the Windows shell. Despite functioning only as a standalone tool, it earns its spot in the Hive Five by offering an enormous amount of granular control. You can apply dozens of variables control your file copying, including filtering files by name and extension and selectively applying file attributes. RichCopy is the only copier in the Hive that has profiles, a must for this app given how many variables it allows you to change. You can create a profile for every copying task you can think of.

SuperCopier (Windows, Free)

SuperCopier is a strong candidate for your flash drive. It’s the only alternative copier here that makes itself the default drag-and-drop handler while the program is active. You can turn SuperCopier into a portable application by going into the Advanced menu and changing the Settings Location to “.ini file”. SuperCopier, like RichCopy also allows you to specify if file attributes and security settings will be copied.

TeraCopy (Windows, Basic: Free / Pro: $US21)

TeraCopy is one of the best known alternative file copiers, winning people over with an interface and functionality that one might call “just advanced enough”. TeraCopy integrates with the Windows shell for drag-and-drop support and includes a solidly laid out right-click menu. It doesn’t overwhelm you with a plethora of settings or options, but it provides enough advanced functionality to speed up file copying, notify you when files don’t copy correctly, and allow you to bulk approve overwriting, renaming, and skipping of duplicate files. TeraCopy is also available in a portable version. The $US21 Pro version adds the ability to select files by extension and remove files from the queue without having to start over.

CopyHandler (Windows, Free)

CopyHandler is another candidate with a ton of customisable options. While RichCopy specialises in granular control over things like file names and attributes, CopyHandler allows you to get as picky as setting custom buffer sizes based on whether a file is being copied to the same physical disk, disk to disk, disk to optical drive, and so forth. You can integrate CopyHandler into the Windows shell and the right-click menu, and you can even instruct it to perform tasks like shutting down the system when the copying is done. CopyHandler is also the only alternative copier listed here which allows you to pause your queue transfer, shut down the computer, and then start the queue up again upon logging back in.

This week’s honorable mention goes to RoboCopy a powerful command line utility originally offered as part of the Windows Resource Kit and now included in Windows Vista and Server 2008. Even with the GUI add-on it’s not pretty or remotely easy to use but it’s quite a powerhouse if you love the command line.

Whether it’s your first time trying out an alternative copier or you’ve long since swapped out the old and busted for the new and streamlined, we want to hear about it in the comments below.


  • Hi guys

    I did some NETWORK COPY tests using TeraCopy 2 on my Windows 7 x64 notebook.. (corei3 4GB RAM).. realtime protection of antivirus turned off so it’ll not interfere w/ speeds…. used a 700mb avi file for test..

    also im copying over Wifi (Wireless N)..

    I did over 20 repeats to make sure the results are pretty accurate.. and sadly, i found TeraCopy slower ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™

    w/ windows 7 native copy , im getting 9-10Mbps,while on tera copy i get around 7-8.5Mbps… and few of the transfers i even got 6Mbps average ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™

    I tried the use system write cache option in TeraCopy but it didnt help a bit.

    are you guys getting the same network copy results? can ya’ll confirm?

  • TeraCopy is great on x86. On x64 I concur with the above. It’s painfully slow. When the only real advantage it brings to the table is resuming interrupted file transfers, I’ll take faster transfers thanks through the native copier thanks.

  • Thanks for sharing such useful information. I am using FastCopy for quite some time and it has been my favourite context menu option for copying files and folders over many network destinations ( remembers all those locations, in its destination list box ). Recently, came to know about grsync, deltacopy etc. to do copying of just the changed portions of files, resulting in considerable savings of bandwidth and resource usage and so, need to check them out now ….

  • Thanks for putting me onto Fast Copy, it really works. My computer sux and when I tried to transfer to my external harddrive (usb) it would start at about 20MBs and drop to about 10 for the most part! Fast Copy can keep it above 20 the whole time which is just fantastic.

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!