Reader Sovanna called my attention to the rather unusual licensing requirements for thesaurus and dictionary program Word Web http://wordweb.info/free/licence5.html. You can use the program for free, provided that you "take at most two commercial flights (not more than one return flight) in any 12 month period". Otherwise, you have to pay up $39 for the Pro version after a 30-day trial. While it's nice to try and encourage everyone to reduce their carbon emissions, this seems to me a pretty ham-fisted way of going about it. For one thing, it makes no allowance for the fact that flying once a year is hardly the definition of excessive travel, especially in a large country like Australia (or the US, come to that). The claims in this context that the pricing is designed to "allow relatively non-wealthy people to use the program free of charge" seems disingenuous to say the least. Nor (as Sovanna points out) does the policy account for whether you try and offset your carbon credits from flights — someone who flies regularly but does that is arguably more actively managing their impact than someone who only hits the skies once a year but spends the rest of the time using their car. So what's to be done? I'll grant you $39 isn't a lot of money, but with that kind of attitude I reckon there are better approaches. A freeware alternative such as previously-mentioned Enso Words leaves you able to donate those funds to the environmental charity of your choice. But have I got the wrong end of the green stick? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Does An Environmental Bully Software Licence Make Sense?
Trending Stories Right Now
Spring is nearly upon us, which means the return of the dreaded Magpie season. Those ruthless swooping demons are extremely aggressive during this time of year as they defend their nests with gusto around gardens, schoolyards and parks. So is it legal to kill one of these angry birds before it pecks an eye out?
The KFC Zinger Double Down King is an "all meat" burger comprising cheese, bacon and a beef patty sandwiched between two KFC breast fillets. In other words, it takes the OTT concept of the KFC Double and elevates it to ludicrous proportions. Tragically, the Double Down King isn't available in Australia, but don't let that stop you from sampling its colon-clogging delights - as the following taste test demonstrates, it's possible to build your own. The results are spectacular... and probably a bit lethal.