work
Iron Is Google Chrome For The Tinfoil Hat Crowd
Posted by Adam Pash at 6:00 AM on September 25, 2008
Windows only: Free application Iron is a slightly modified version of the Chromium source of Google Chrome that removes components of Chrome that report your usage habits to Google. In practice, that means it removes your unique user ID, doesn't send user-specific info to Google, skips crash reporting, and doesn't check with Google for updates. Some features—like crash reporting and update checks—are built into most browsers anyway, but if you're already squeamish with the amount of your information Google already has on its servers, the extra layer of privacy Iron offers might be up your alley. The download site and installer are in German (here's a translation), but the app runs in English.

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
buradleix
Posted 6:28 AM 25/9/08
@bodah: same reason for me, but what happens when chrome updates, or what if google decides to work in other invasive 'features'? as badly as i would like to make chrome my regular browser at work, i just feel like google knows me too well already.
buradleix
jsmorley
Posted 6:22 AM 25/9/08
Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you...
jsmorley
Phoshi
Posted 6:11 AM 25/9/08
@Deadhacker: It's a tin hat, dude.
Having said that, it's a stylish tin hat, with a fluffy bobble and everything.
Phoshi
Deadhacker
Posted 6:09 AM 25/9/08
Not so much "tinfoil hat" as "already been a victim of identity theft and see no reason to make it easier to victimize us again" crowd, thank you very much.
Paranoia is a survival trait.
Deadhacker
bodah
Posted 6:04 AM 25/9/08
This was part of the reason I haven't tried Chrome yet, it may be time to give it a try.
bodah
SRone2
Posted 6:53 AM 25/9/08
Ironically, if you are really that paranoid should you be using a translation through google servers?
SRone2
Phoshi
Posted 6:45 AM 25/9/08
@Mark: It's actually: "IF you think hard enough, everyone's out to get you"
Actually I just made that up.
Phoshi
kartal
Posted 6:41 AM 25/9/08
Amazing title. Chrome`s some of the well documented features endangers user`s privacy, sounds quite mainstream to me.
kartal
Mark
Posted 6:39 AM 25/9/08
@jsmorley:
It's actually, "Just because you aren't paranoid, doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you."
Mark
Asian Angel
Posted 7:12 AM 25/9/08
I found this part on the "Chrome vs. Iron" page...
Iron is using the newest version of Webkit (version 525.19) whereas Chrome is using the old version (version 525.13). ^__^
Asian Angel
jsmorley
Posted 7:09 AM 25/9/08
@Mark:
No, it's not... Your version is neither pithy nor funny. You see "paranoid" is an unreasonable / unfounded fear that someone is out to get you. The joke is, just because you are crazy and think the world is out to get you doesn't mean it can't also be true...
jsmorley
Piaculum
Posted 7:08 AM 25/9/08
@SRone2: @freelancewriter: You really think that MIT is a non-profit? Just because they're tax exempt doesn't make it so...
Piaculum
Asian Angel
Posted 7:06 AM 25/9/08
I am really glad to see this modification. ^__^ This is a version that I can use. ^__^
Adam, thank you so much for posting this! ^__^
@SRone2: I thought the same thing as far as using a Google service (not the paranoia part), so I ran the translation through Babel Fish at Yahoo Asia. ^__^
Asian Angel
jupiterthunder
Posted 7:05 AM 25/9/08
@Mark:
He had it just fine. Except it should be "everyone" not "someone" as I have heard it.
But really, they all work.
jupiterthunder
freelancewriter
Posted 7:01 AM 25/9/08
I applaud the effort, but I lack the knowledge to analyze the code itself. If you are already wearing a tinfoil hat, can you trust the company that created this? Or did they embed questionable code themselves?
As mentioned in a previous post, I'd trust something like this more if it was done by a recognized non-profit such as MIT or University of Illinois.
freelancewriter
resonanteye
Posted 7:36 AM 25/9/08
no tinfoil hat here, yet. but I prefer to be paid to participate in marketing surveys or for the use of my personal data. so this looks good!
resonanteye
ez10
Posted 7:29 AM 25/9/08
one thing that doesn't work in Chrome for me is Firefox's search bar. I my #1 search engine is Google, however I love the fact that I can search through Wikipedia from my browser bar. Or Yahoo for that matter.
Google didn't offer this so I'm betting that this won't either from a quick click away.
ez10
CnEY
Posted 7:20 AM 25/9/08
Awesome, I am so getting this...
but...
Why didn't they call it Tin, or Aluminum?
CnEY
Coffenated
Posted 8:08 AM 25/9/08
I'm impressed. Iron just kicked Chromes pants HARD!
I have never seen a web browser load up so quickly or as efficiently as Iron did. Sorry Chrome, you're history!
Coffenated
wngchng87
Posted 8:06 AM 25/9/08
@SRone2:
haha right on Srone, my thoughts exactly
wngchng87
kerpalguy
Posted 8:36 AM 25/9/08
I always had the creeps while surfing with Chrome, especially when my Outpost firewall told me google Chrome wanted to activate a keylogger :-/ Iron appears to be much safer than Chrome, as far as data privacy goes.
kerpalguy
Mark
Posted 8:30 AM 25/9/08
@jsmorley:
I know what paranoid is. The idea is that just because you don't think that someone is out to get you does not mean that someone is not out to get you. Paranoid people already think that someone or everyone is out to get them. This and "I could care less" which should be "I could not care less" are often misquoted. I see your interpretation, though, and understand your point.
Mark
Hands
Posted 8:19 AM 25/9/08
Anyone wanna bet that Google's next product will be tin hats?
Hands
Rohan_Zurich
Posted 8:52 AM 25/9/08
lol @ "tin hat crew". I've been using Chrome occasionaly, without the Unchrome and Anochro at first. Well at least this solution sounds good and i've been using it since this morning my time zone, central european time and it works just as good as Chrome.
I use Google products everyday and i sometimes hesitate about what i put into the Google search box.
I can't be sure this Iron version has no spyware etc. either, but i have never trusted any software unconditionally in the first place.
Feel free to laugh at the tin hat attitude, but i bet a lot of motor cyclists ,and construction workers wished they had worn their tin hats too lol.
Rohan_Zurich
tgrantt
Posted 8:39 AM 25/9/08
@Deadhacker: "It's not whether you're paranoid. It's whether you are paranoid enough." As the strange woman told the Lone Gunmen.
tgrantt
GeraldineNiger
Posted 8:32 AM 25/9/08
Anyone else disturbed they called it Iron. I mean Germans, information control, Iron Curtain. Bueller? Bueller?
GeraldineNiger
Popsonian
Posted 10:08 AM 25/9/08
@torsoboy:
Is there a special clause for Hackintosh 'puters?
It's the Platypus of computers.
Popsonian
Popsonian
Posted 10:05 AM 25/9/08
Maybe I'm missing something but who said online activity was private?
If I'm doing searches on Google's servers, I expect them to keep track of what I'm searching for. . . not so they can stalk me or sell that information to illegal immigrants and thieves, but so they can perfect their marketing strategy.
In the end, it really doesn't matter if Google knows how many times I searched for "Hot Rabbit on Hare porn" or how many times I clicked the "hot, sexy, single {midgets}" link on the right side of the screen. It might be useful to them for marketing, but my Google search records aren't going to prove much about me except that it's my home page. . .and even if it did, IT'S THE INTERNET. . . they only get what you give them. . .and no one is going to steal your identity with knowledge of your Jay Leno fetish or the number of times you've searched for "farting panda" on YouTube.
Now, go forth and Google.
Popsonian
torsoboy
Posted 10:02 AM 25/9/08
@Coffenated: It's based directly on the source code of Google Chrome with a few features stripped out... That's like me buying a Dell computer, removing a networking card, and calling it a completely new system. =)
torsoboy
rdn98
Posted 10:26 AM 25/9/08
@Popsonian: I totally agree with you. Why are people so paranoid about Google and the idea of Google watching you or whatever?
How does this make you not rest easy at night? To me, hell I could care less. How about other search engines? I don't see any crap about those!
rdn98
rdn98
Posted 10:25 AM 25/9/08
@freelancewriter: Sweet. I went to University of Illinois. Go Illini!!!
rdn98
Defcon1
Posted 10:10 AM 25/9/08
Glad to see someone actually do this. Although the more I learn about internet security the more I only worry about my personal information that could be abused (identity theft). Slowly I am becoming less and less conscious about who could be watching what I am doing because it is way to easy to. When you connect to the internet most likely you are going to public places, so someone is watching somewhere. I think I will just pretend to be ignorant about usage statistics and other semi-harmless information.
Defcon1
nightbirdsf
Posted 11:48 AM 25/9/08
@GeraldineNiger: Nope, not at all. I think it's a fine name.
nightbirdsf
kartal
Posted 12:38 PM 25/9/08
@rdn98:
Just wait and see. You will understand why people are so paranoid about companies like Google.
kartal
dasverlangen
Posted 1:00 PM 25/9/08
Once again, there can be no security until and unless the very nature of the internet itself is changed - DNS is a great protocol for networking, but terrible for security...hell, the cDc (Cult of the Dead Cow) and L0pht knew about the unsecure nature of the internet for decades before Kaminsky called out webmasters and server operators...but I digress.
It's not what Google does with the data which is bothersome, it's the principle of it. Google has offered nor provided no service to me which warrants anyone at that company, computer, person, or extra-terrestrial, to know my search patterns, interest, hobbies, sexual preferences, pr0n habits, reading lists, restaurant preferences, or location. Period. Google doesn't deserve to know that information at all - not for advertising purposes (especially as I ignore all advertisements), not for data retention and aggregate trend analysis of traffic - nothing. No service Google provides, be it webspace, email, convenient and useful search, mapping, or news, is sufficient to warrant storing my personal data on its servers. Larry, Sergei, (Chang?) - keep your hands off my internet protocol address and I won't crush your ad revenue bots with no-script. End of fucking story.
dasverlangen
tonynyc
Posted 1:30 PM 25/9/08
I like Chrome, but I want the click sound, like IE has when you click on a link or button, until then I will keep using the best: IE6.
tonynyc
Niscrome
Posted 1:56 PM 25/9/08
Preach on brotha!!!
Niscrome
Zepth
Posted 2:46 PM 25/9/08
I don't suffer from the paranoia where i think someone's out to get me, i suffer from a kind where i think no-body's out to get me...it's almost scarier, but it does sorta help you to test out programs like chrome....i mean wouldn't perform anything important through it....but then i don't do anything important any ways
Zepth
Torley
Posted 3:08 PM 25/9/08
Why didn't they just name it "Tinfoil"? ;D
Torley
Popsonian
Posted 4:37 PM 25/9/08
I think a more fitting name would be "Panacea" or "Placebo." (Depending on what side of the privacy line you stand on)
Popsonian
delagato
Posted 6:58 PM 25/9/08
I would pretty much want to try this, but fact of "doesn't check with Google for updates" keeps me back
delagato
mattarse
Posted 7:30 PM 25/9/08
@dasverlangen: Isn't using google basically saying that what they offer warrants what they collect on you? You do have a choice to go elsewhere, although there are very few offerings that will work as well, or as conveniently as google, all of which do cost money that they pay for by advertising.
Do you use google products?
I do actually agree with you partially though, but I think that it's incorrect to complain about them collecting data, as long as they are honest about what is collected. It's when companies try to hide what they are collecting that I get bothered.
There was a search site a few months (or maybe last year) that advertised that they wouldn't collect information on the users, sorry can't remember the name of it, but it didn't seem to gather popularity based on this.
mattarse
Sjoerd
Posted 8:12 PM 25/9/08
I join the crowd here in being a little insulted by the title. It is not that I am paranoid, i just do not think the quality of google's products warant the amount of data-mining they do. The information they gather from me is worth a whole lot more than a competing browser in my eyes and therefore i do not use chrome, g-mail etc.
Their search engine is awesome however and through lack of proper alternatives I use it. It's a balance of pro's and cons and has nothing to do with being 'paranoid'.
Well maybe a little. I simply do not trust anyone that gathers too much power (be it in force, money or knowledge) and google is definately gathering too much of it and showing every intention of trying to get more (of course).
Sjoerd
kickarse
Posted 12:12 AM 26/9/08
@CnEY: Becuase then they'd have people going "It's spelled Aluminium you dolt!" and search engines would be screwed up. Especially for those silly Brits. :)
kickarse
eightseventeen
Posted 12:40 AM 26/9/08
@tonynyc: Ummm... are you serious? Did I read you right? The most obnoxious and unnecessary quality of IE is the reason you won't switch browsers?
My head is spinning...
eightseventeen
eightseventeen
Posted 12:37 AM 26/9/08
@Popsonian: I agree totally. People spend WAY too much time worrying about what they are doing online. If you have truly sensitive information, use a trusted, secure site. Otherwise, you're at risk whether you are using a Google product or not.
These paranoid worrywarts need to get over themselves! There are so many other ways besides spying on you online to steal your identity...
eightseventeen
Asian Angel
Posted 12:56 AM 26/9/08
@Kafka: On my computer it is:
Program Files --> Iron Browser --> Themes
Nice and simple compared to the original Chrome installation...I can not say for certain about Chromium since I only tried the portable version briefly...
Asian Angel
Kafka
Posted 12:52 AM 26/9/08
I like it. Anybody found the folder to place new themes? Couple things have changed from the default Chrome locations. I'm betting this is the same setup as Chromium.
Kafka
P_Smith
Posted 3:07 AM 26/9/08
@Deadhacker: Not so much "tinfoil hat" as "already been a victim of identity theft and see no reason to make it easier to victimize us again" crowd, thank you very much.
Paranoia is a survival trait.
It's not paranoia, it's caution and prudence. The paranoid are those who think Google will be any less "evil" than Microshaft as their marketshare increases. Best intentions and claims of them never survive increasing profit margins.
P_Smith
SpudDude
Posted 3:40 AM 26/9/08
I've abstained from using Chrome for this very reason. Thanks Iron!
SpudDude
Rohan_Zurich
Posted 4:57 AM 26/9/08
@delagato: Hi delegato, i was digging around in the iron website forum, and one post asked the update question, and one of the software team or moderator said an update feature is coming sometime soon....
Rohan_Zurich
michaelleung
Posted 11:22 AM 26/9/08
Does it still have the "fatal flaw" that can contribute to a broken relationship?
michaelleung
Khurt
Posted 11:56 PM 26/9/08
@dasverlangen: "Google has offered nor provided no service to me which warrants anyone at that company, computer, person, or extra-terrestrial, to know my search patterns, interest, hobbies, sexual preferences, pr0n habits, reading lists, restaurant preferences, or location. "
You're kidding right? Google provides a number of services and provides an explanation of the terms under which those services are being provided. If you don't agree with those terms ... don't use the service.
I don't like what my employer has asked me to do I am free to quit. Likewise if my employer sees that I am no living up to the terms of our agreement they are free to fire me.
So you don't like Google's terms ... go use yahoo or MSN. What? They have similar terms of use? Ok, go write your own search engine. Go on. Get to it.
Khurt
Khurt
Posted 11:51 PM 26/9/08
@resonanteye: You are being paid for the use of your personal information. Google is proving a search service to you.
Khurt
Khurt
Posted 12:03 AM 27/9/08
@tonynyc: IE6? You are kidding! Good joke. Thanks.
Khurt
Khurt
Posted 12:00 AM 27/9/08
@kickarse: Yeah those silly English people. How dare they tell us how to speak there language.
Khurt
LandonLabarixair
Posted 2:48 AM 27/9/08
I would be willing to use Chrome if Google were able to get their energy policy sanctioned by the government. I would wash the CEO's car every day if they could get this passed. Energy independence should be a top priority for us, and it is very forward thinking when it comes to renewable energy. Otherwise, I am using Iron.
LandonLabarixair
marckc22
Posted 9:22 PM 25/9/08
Yay! at least we can get a little of our privacy back... Finally, something faster than firefox without some of Chrome's problems.
marckc22
kickarse
Posted 12:08 AM 1/10/08
@Khurt: That's the way the world turns my man.
kickarse