organise
How Priorities Make Things Happen
Posted by Lifehacker US Edition at 9:00 PM on July 9, 2008
Editor: Project manager and writer Scott Berkun knows how to get things done when you've got a team of people, a to-do list, and a deadline. Today he offers an excerpt from the updated edition of his best-selling book The Art of Project Management (our review), entitled Making Things Happen.
Prioritisation is always more emotional than intellectual, despite what people say. Just like dieting to lose weight or budgeting to save money, eliminating things you want, but don't need, requires being disciplined, committed, and focused. Saying "exercise is important" is one thing, but ranking it against other important things is entirely different. Many people chicken out of this process. They hedge, delay and deny the tough choices, and the result is that they set up projects to fail. No tough choices means no progress. In the abstract, the word important means nothing.
The easiest way to make a goal meaningful is to use ordered lists and a high priority one bar. These two simple tools force you to make tough decisions early. An ordered list simply means putting your goals in priority order, most important at the top, least important at the bottom. Divide that list in half: the top are things you must do, or die (Priority 1). The rest are things you hope to do, but can live without (Priority 2). Make your priority 1 list as small as possible: set a high bar. The smaller your list of must do's, the easier they are to achieve. You will face waves of conflicting emotions as you decide what is truly important, but once you settle on priorities the hard decisions will be behind you.
Doing the tough decision making early creates clarity, and clarity is the true way to make things happen on projects. No-bullshit tools like ordered lists reinforce commitments and make them public. Everyone can show up to work with a strong sense of what he is doing, why he's doing it, and how it relates to what others are doing. When the inevitable moments of doubt arise and you or your team question the plans, you want to be ready. If people can easily look back to a simple set of ordered goals, it enables simple, direct and clear questions. Even if there are disagreements, the clarity of the goals makes those debates productive and positive.
Priorities are power
Have you ever been in a tough argument that you thought would never end? Perhaps half your team felt strongly for adding more features, and the other half felt strongly for increasing quality. But then the smart team leader hero dude walks in, asks some questions, divides the discussion in a new way, and quickly gets everyone to agree. It's happened to me many times. When I was younger, I chalked this up to brilliance: somehow the leader was just smarter than the rest of the room. But as I paid more attention I realised it was about having rock solid priorities. They had an ordered list in their heads for what is most important and were able to share it with others when necessary. Good priorities are power. They eliminate secondary distractions from the discussion, making it easier to focus on what matters.
If you have priorities in place you can always ask questions in any discussion that reframe the argument. This can work when working alone or with others. When there is uncertainty or disagreement, reframe the discussion around the priorities using questions like these.
- What problem are we trying to solve?
- Does this problem relate to our top goals or is it a distraction?
- Is this problem important enough to warrant changing our priorities?
- What is the simplest way to resolve this that will allow us to meet out goals?
- If we're struggling to meet our goals, which goal can we drop down to Priority 2?
Things happen when you say No
One effect of having priorities is how often you have to say no. It's one of the smallest words in the English language, yet many people have trouble saying it. The problem is that if you can't say no, you can't have priorities. The universe is a large place, but your priority one list should be very small. That small list means there are thousands of good ideas that must be denied to focus your energy on the ones you've chosen to pursue. If you continually say yes to ideas that do not match your priorities, you are saying yes to failure. If you want to change your priorities, that's one thing, but if you are constantly changing them then they were never priorities at all. You did not think deeply enough about them if, emotionally, they are easy to change every few hours. So a fundamental law is this: if you can't say no, if you can't protect your priorities, you can't make things happen.
Excerpt copyright © 2008 Scott Berkun. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Berkun's no-nonsense, common sense advice is a good read whether or not your business card title reads "Project Manager." If you've got a crazy-making manager who can't keep your team on track? Buy a copy of this book leave it on his or her desk.
Tags: organise | priorities | project management

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
manodogs
Posted 10:36 PM 9/7/08
This is definitely my problem: I'm great at making lists, just lousy at sticking to them. I make "draft" after "draft" of prioritized lists, but instead of sitting down and actually prioritizing them, I knock out this little chore and that one, then when I lose impetus, sit down and make another "draft." I understand the object of the post, but I believe my problem has more to do with indecision.
However, a list (prioritized or not) is key to getting anything done (said the man who went to the grocery store for the first time in months without a list and spent $131.00!)...
manodogs
Minimalist Geek
Posted 11:32 PM 9/7/08
Big thanks Lifehacker for pointing out this article but especially Scott Berkun.
I went through some of Scott's essays and watched his Carnegie Mellon talk. This guy talks no nonsense. It clearly shows that his years of experience as a pragmatic project manager taught him a lot.
Minimalist Geek
DanYHKim
Posted 12:32 AM 10/7/08
In The Incredibles, Syndrome points out that "When everybody is special . . . nobody will be."
In the same way, having one "important, high-priority" task after another fall one your desk makes them all "routine". Having the latest "priority" task trump the one you're working on negates the meaning of "priority".
DanYHKim
Castle1914
Posted 1:26 AM 10/7/08
Another method I use in my ordered lists is "What can I get done quickly or with the least effort".
For instance, I am remodeling my house. I have a list of things that are discrete projects in that larger project. I Primarily order the projects by how much impact completing them will have on living in the house. However I also mark them as to "things I can do now with materials on hand".
This allows me to know what I need to try to get done, but if I don't have the money to buy the materials I default to my "materials on hand" list. That way I don't waste time waiting for resources.
Castle1914
Gina Trapani
Posted 4:51 AM 10/7/08
Just updated the post to clarify--Making Things Happen is an updated edition of Berkun's book, The Art of Project Management which we reviewed here.
Gina Trapani