Get Vista's Best Features in XP

Despite the fact that most of you prefer XP to Vista and would rather Microsoft extended XP's shelf-life, several new and improved features available in Vista would be great to have in XP. This new functionality may not be enough to get you to switch to Vista, but that doesn't mean you're out of luck. Let's take a look at a few ways you can incorporate Windows Vista's best features into your current XP PC for free.
We're going to focus on Vista's small and large features that are missing from XP, separated into three categories: applications, functional, and aesthetic (e.g., transparency is aesthetic, the new start menu search is functional). This list is not exhaustive, but it does cover the features readers feel make Vista worth it.
Bring Vista's Best New and Improved Apps to XP
First, aside from some of the small operating system improvements we'll go into below, Vista also bundles up a few new and improved applications worth mentioning.
A Better Explorer: Windows Explorer is one of the most improved applications in Vista, thanks to added features like breadcrumb navigation, better file previews, and more. There are a few add-ons that add some of these better functional adjustments to Explorer, but in general XP users might want to consider replacing XP's Explorer altogether with something like Xplorer2 (original post) or significantly beefing it up with a tool like QT TabBar (original post). You can also get that saucy breadcrumb navigation alone with Explorer Breadcrumbs (original post).
Encrypt Your Hard Drive: Some versions of Vista—toward the Ultimate end of the scale—come with a new drive encryption software called BitLocker built in. If you're keen on security and encryption but you want to stick with XP, check out the free, open source TrueCrypt (original post). If you need a little help getting started, check out our guide to encrypting data with TrueCrypt.
Take Quick and Easy Screenshots: PrtScrn has been around forever, but it's never been the most user-friendly way to get a screenshot. In Vista, Microsoft threw in a screenshot utility called the Snipping Tool. Fact is, if better screenshots are important to you, there are gobs of excellent free screenshot apps available for XP like Screenshot Captor (original post), Clip2Net (original post), and Jing (original post), among many others.
Bring Vista's Best Functional Features to XP
Task-Switching à la Flip 3D: Vista's Flip 3D is like Alt-Tab on steroids, displaying full previews of each window as you move through it. To a large extent it's eye candy, but it can also be really useful in finding the right window when you're switching from your keyboard. Freeware applications like Shock Aero 3D (original post) and WinFlip bring the same 3D shuffling (and then some, in the case of WinFlip) to to your XP desktop.
Integrated Start Menu Search and Launch: Dubbed Instant Search by Microsoft, this new feature adds a search box to the Windows Start menu for quick searching and launching of documents and applications. If you want to port this same functionality to XP, you can do so with apps like ViStart (original post) or Vista Start Menu (original post)—an extraordinarily beefed up version of the Windows Start menu. Then again, if you're not stuck on the notion of a search-and-launch box built directly into the Start menu, you can't go wrong with Launchy or Google Desktop Search.
Replace the Windows Sidebar: Third-party tools similar to Windows Sidebar and Gadgets pre-dated Vista, so you can trade in desktop real estate for the same functionality with SideSlide (original post) or the Google Desktop Sidebar.
Live Thumbnail Previews of Files: Vista does a nice job of providing thumbnail previews to most image files and even text files, and while XP does have similar functionality, it's not as advanced as Vista's. Freeware application Xentient Thumbnails (original post) creates live thumbnails for virtually all images, and if you want a more intimate look at the innards of text and other files without opening them, check out InfoTag Magic (original post).
Speed Up Your System with a Thumb Drive: Windows ReadyBoost speeds up your performance by using a USB thumb drive as system memory, and while nothing beats an actual RAM upgrade, XP users can check out eBoostr (original post) to bring the same functionality to XP.
Streamline Your File Renaming: Microsoft got smart in Vista and changed the behaviour when you hit F2 to rename a file, selecting only the name of the file and leaving the extension alone. For a very simple integration of this feature into XP, check out the Better Rename utility. Alternately, if you feel like adding this feature and beefing up Windows Explorer on top of that, you can get the same renaming behaviour in Xplorer2 (original post) or QT TabBar (original post).
Taskbar Window Previews: If you like how Vista offers handy little thumbnail previews of windows when you hover over their taskbar item, freeware application Visual Tooltip (original post) brings the same goods to XP.
Give XP that Vista Look
Ultimately, despite all the little feature improvements Vista can throw your way, a new operating system's biggest selling point is often the eye candy—in Vista's case, Aero. There are a lot of tools available that can help you theme XP to look more like Vista, though often users of such applications see mixed results, so proceed at your own risk. Probably the most comprehensive XP-to-Vista tweaker is the Vista Transformation Pack, which transforms everything from the Start menu and Control Panel to icons.
For a less full-on approach, you could try out skinning utility Uxtheme Patcher with one of several themes from art web site deviantART (like this one or this one) to make XP look and feel more like Vista.
Isn't There More to It Than That?
There are surely some under-the-hood changes in Vista that you won't get from these simple upgrades, but let's be honest: You care about the features, not the underlying code. And since you can get most of Vista's new features from the comfort of XP—and you can stick to XP as a quick, resource-light alternative to Vista—it looks like most of you won't be changing horses anytime soon.If there's a Vista feature or an XP app you love that wasn't included in this list, let's hear about it in the comments. While you're getting the goods of Vista in XP, you may also want to take a look at how you can get the best of Firefox in Internet Explorer.
Adam Pash is a senior editor for Lifehacker who really only likes XP for its snazzy Media Centre improvements. His special feature Hack Attack appears every Tuesday on Lifehacker.



View: AU Comments (0) | US Comments (110 comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this entry.
@superbryant88 pretending your not rude by saying that you don't want to seem rude makes you and idiot moron. Having a mac makes you cool? (sorry, i "seem" to have made my point twice)
Scott63
Windows Live Photo Gallery removes the only incentive I ha to upgrade. The only feature of vista I was interested in was the photo manager, but now they've released it for free on XP. (and it rocks).
Dunno if its been mentioned before... too many comments on LH these days to read them all. But on the of-chance it hasn't.. hopefully it'll help anyone who reads this far...
soul_grind
@drchrisco: That wasn't the point...
Windows doesn't have a program that walks you through the install of ANOTHER operating system. That really shows that Apple has a lot of confidence in their OS and that they're not trying their hardest to keep everyone from using the software they want to.
Anyway, it's things like that that cause me to have no respect for Microsoft. I'm really glad that the EU is breathing down their neck and reversing this proprietary crap that Microsoft has gotten away with for so long.
And I really don't want to hear the rebuttal that "Apple is more proprietary because they don't sell OS X for other hardware". Apple is a hardware company. Microsoft is not. Microsoft would lose nothing by actually allowing you to remove software like Messenger or Internet Explorer.
jw0ollard
There is also the Styler bar available for free now which gives you a Vista style toolbar in Explorer.
da5id_nz
4 flavors:
Linux > OSX > XP > Vista
Sometimes I feel like Vanilla, sometimes Chocolate.
It's great, pick a flavor, any flavor.
bleeble blabble
CameronCook
Sigh, what about Windows XP Second Edition? Wouldn't that just solve all the operating system problems? Or, maybe Windows OS XP [insert name of a Canine].
Dooga
@rand0mCreep: Uhh. XP came out in 2001.
radio1
@thejynxed: Ok, exactly what version did you ran that had all those issues?
Most of what you write about is FUD.
You seem to have stopped bothering with linux rather quickly, so i would suggest you have another look (begin with something with a stronger community drive and support like Ubuntu or Fedora).
I would also like to add that you can check out [wine-review.blogspot.com] . The blogger tells you how to get many programs (and games) running on Linux under Wine. That is if you cannot get an alternative program (highly doubtful about this one) or if you simply prefer to use THAT commercial software instead (and that's ok).
whiskey
XP > Vista > Linux
Linux sucks because softwares that most people need wouldn't run on it. That makes all the difference in why 90%+ of the world is using windows. We use computer for the software, not the OS. Software Compatibility is Key to a superior OS.
Ken
sadly, the features I'm looking for aren't included in this article.
1) DX10
2) The Volume Mixer (ability to mute certain programs)
nikdahl
"There are many amazing things about Leopard that Windows will never be able to approach. Like Boot Camp, Leopard's UNIX base, etc. :)"
You can boot to a different windows installation on a PC.
Is there a precaching functionality for windows xp? I like that my system uses my memory efficently.
drchrisco
"And I also have learned that when someone says I dont want to make you out to be an idiot...
Usually means hey idiot whats up with your lack of a brain. :)"
Your right lol
superbryant88
Think twice before installing these.
I explored Xentient Thumbnails and Explorer Breadcrumbs. One of them left my machine funky, with munged left-click function. Uninstalling did not fix the problem, nor could System Restore. Only reverting to an image of the boot partion got me running again.
It's not really worth the trouble for features like this. It's definitely not worth it unless you have a recent, known-good boot image you can revert to.
That_Bastid
@jw0ollard: Oh, and the fact that I could type Exposé with the accent without using Character Map or memorizing ALT+XXXX codes. :)
jw0ollard
Can you please do an article called "Get Leopard's Best Features in XP (or Vista for that matter)?"
:)
- Exposé > Flip 3D
- Spotlight > Desktop Search
- New Finder (Cover Flow) > Windows Explorer (Filmstrip mode)
- Quick Look > .... NOTHING ....
- Time Machine > System Restore
- Dock > Taskbar
- Stacks > .... NOTHING ....
- Spaces > .... NOTHING ....
- iCal > .... NOTHING ....
- Preview > Windows Picture and Fax Viewer (XP)
- TextEdit > Notepad
I am not in any way saying that the above features are the "Best in Leopard" either.. There are many amazing things about Leopard that Windows will never be able to approach. Like Boot Camp, Leopard's UNIX base, etc. :)
jw0ollard
@superbryant88: Wow you sure nailed that one!
But I don't think people with mullets actually look for jobs they wait for opportunity to come knocking on their trailer parks.
Sadly it is usually just a twister.
And I also have learned that when someone says I dont want to make you out to be an idiot...
Usually means hey idiot whats up with your lack of a brain. :)
AskTheAdmin
Well, get a MAC! All these features are there for a lot of years without downloading!
ImmacolataMakudonarudo
@rand0mCreep: Dude I don't wanna seem mean but your an idiot. If anything Why don't you Vista users spend the money for a Mac..instead of pretending your cool enough to have one??...I could say more but i gotta go "cut my mullet and find a job"
superbryant88
If I were still running XP, I don't think I'd actually want pointless eye candy using up my resources. Sure it looks good, but it's not going to impress anyone, and it's not going to save you time.
imagia
very god post
alian.info
Both Shock Aero 3D and WinFlip have issues. Shock Aero 3D eats up too much resources and slow. WinFlip is much light and fast but after using awhile, the system becomes unstable and eventually you would want to kill the restart the WinFlip process.
hanadaddy
@BillyGnSC
Live, Learn, then get a non-crappy AV. This is a False-Positive. Do some research before you start throwing profanities around.
twig123
Will these features turn my XP machine into a useless paperweight like it would be if it were running Vista?
bms
Does anyone know of a program for Xp that does the same thing as the "globe" icon that appears on your network activity icons? I often lose my DSL synch, and it came in handy to know when I was actually connected to the internet vs just connected to the network.
cubensis
I agree with a liot of these comments above, all these features have been available in Linux for a VERY long time now...
Just like Microsoft to hop on the band wagon when its too late...
Compiz-fusion p*sses all over vistas effects!!
takuhii
@K5Doom: When wanting to customize the interface. True. Vista was not the first with a lot of the features. But everyone rips everyone off and steals from each other.
I also want to be able to play games and do Windows programming. Being able to tab with live previews does not compensate for that.
I would probably have to agree more with solomon7 on this one...
Aglet
Vista Transformation Pack + Win SP3.
No.
SP3 is, according to the installer, an 'unsupported OS'.
PenguinPhjil
@K5Doom:
XP > Linux >> Vista
XP is better because Linux doesn't have useful apps for other than basic things.
Open Source equivalents aren't useful at all.
solomon7
@Adian:
I didn't read through the dogma topics in this thread, but I found something that's non-freeware. [www.indievolume.com] Seems like it does it for XP. Will probably save your speakers ;)
y3n0
@Dignan17: I agree about the networking thing. To share drives within my network via samba is like pulling teeth. upnp works, but I don't LIKE upnp.
To give everyone an idea, to share a folder, you first have to establish the connection. Then change permissions w/in the folder itself. Then allow network sharing. Then disable network password requirements.
I think there's more, but that's all I remember at the moemnt.
I have enough ram that speed issues aren't a demon for me. I don't crash browsing video folders, like I used to in XP. Generally, establishing network connections is AWESOME these days. But I HATE sharing anything with Vista.
njthomas
@eternicode:
I tried linux literally yesterday. Mind you, it was primarily in an attempt to make xbmc work, but I nevertheless had to much around with Terminal to get my video drivers working, as well as to do the entire xbmc install.
I'm sorry, in my opinion, "power" can suck it. The nice thing about windows is the only time you need to type is to enter in a website (if you don't have it book marked), to search for something, or to provide a username, address, and/or password. I don't want to spend hours and hours trying figure out why linux isn't working. I appreciate the liveCD. I like the ability to play around with disk drives. But beyond those two areas, I prefer never to use linux in my daily life.
On the other hand, you can feel free to disregard my opinion, because I actually like and use Vista.
njthomas
Oh, and by the way, networking on Vista is one of the most maddening experiences ever. I can't STAND it.
Dignan17
Yes, it's true, adding these things to XP can put a bit of load on a PC, but nothing crazy! I just installed XP on my old laptop (Toshiba Tecra S1), and I threw a gig of RAM in it because the memory was bad.
I've grown to hate the Fischer Price look of the OS, and I feel that the only advantage Vista has is Aero Glass. I recently installed a bunch of stuff from CrystalXP (I'm surprised this post didn't mention the site more).
So I have a Bricopack from them, and I've installed about three other applications of theirs, and in total it's taking up about 20MB of RAM. OH NO!! How will I live like this?
To all the people saying that this stuff will overload an XP system: that's not the point. Sure, Vista does all this stuff natively, but in my experience (as a person who deals with dozens of different home installations of Vista), I have no question that Vista is less stable than XP. Basically, the question is whether you want to make additions to an old home on a sturdy foundation, or simply try to get by with floorboards over a sand bed.
Anyway, that's how I feel about it.
Oh, and I like Linux, I'm getting used to Linux, and want to learn more about Linux, but if anyone ever tells me (and I'm not saying anyone here is) that Linux is ready for the average computer user, I am going to laugh in their faces. It simply and plainly IS NOT.
Sorry, had to get that little rant off my chest. I hate to start a religious war or anything, but that's how I feel...
Dignan17
I'm loving vista right now. Its quick, has some great new features, and things are so much easier than on my linux machine. I know it is "the cool thing to do" to hate Vista, but I have had zero problems with it, and enjoy the new security and functionality.
OmegaRed59
Its really great for the guy like me. Because still i'm using windows xp service pack2. With Stability and consistency so..This post is useful for me..
----------------------------
[4thesakeofu.blogspot.com]
[divine-thought.blogspot.com]
[technozip.blogspot.com]
gsvvmail
This is great if you want the eye candy of vista, you certainly would not want vista it self. Its way too slow.
I like things to happen as soon as I click them with no precievable delay, even xp is slightly sluggish. But not as slow a Vista. I personally use win2k though, It really moves on my 1.8Ghz dual core.
MIKE-STAMP
xp'ers are sensitive about their outdated operating system. i still haven't heard a valid reason to keep xp. the ugly, old, outdated, lack of visuals, slow, easily infected, unstable, virtually useless, but was a hit in the 90's, operating system. xp'ers have only convinced me that they just can't afford it. i bet they use free security programs too...
rand0mCreep
Add UAC protection to XP. Download Microsoft Windows Defender and turn on Advanced Spynet Membership. It will protect your registry, browser and firewall from changes by asking for your permission. Peter HerzogMinneapols, MN
MinervaSongbird
Who cares about who wants to load up on 'fixins' to make XP a little more like Vista???
Maybe you want to experiment?
Maybe some of your hardware does not work in Vista?
I would not mind trying out some of these programs? Why? Because the last time I tried to install Vista it took nearly three hours to install and the quickest I could get my boot time down to was 15 minutes. I have a dual core 5200+ and 4GB memory and a 500GB SATAII drive.
So, yeah, I would like to try a visual pack or a sidebar. Perhaps it drains my system and I uninstall and try installing Vista again...
radio1
@hooligans: Teracopy. Occasionally crashes but 99% good.
davebarboza
Just wondering, once you get all these working on XP, what's the ram usage? I've done a "little" (sidebar and Vista like visual theme) Vista transformation on my XP Desktop, haven't really monitored the ram though. That integrated search looks rather enticing for XP. The only problem I have with installing more apps on XP that aren't directly integrated into the OS is that it introduces more variables for instability. If it works though, I suppose its all good, I've had bad experiences in the past with other things, why I kept my Vista transformation rather low to mainly visual style.
SDreamer
What about right-click on a USB drive to quickly unmount it?
iverevi
Is there a way to tag things like in vista? The Metadata I heard that you can tag images and pdfs ect. on vista. Is there a way to tag things in xp?
zaqwithaq
Oh, and here's a hack for getting DirectX 10 on XP:
[www.techmixer.com]
thewriteguy
Doesn't it defeat the purpose of XP though?
We're really just introducing more "bloat" to XP by installing this stuff.
I think you'll find that if you switch off a bunch of Vista defaults (services/startup items etc) you'll get Vista performing fairly well.
I'm on XP at the moment, but that's because there's no point in me upgrading when everything still works (as they say "if it ain't broke, don't fix it!"). I'll only move to Vista if/when I buy a new PC.
William
If you want the stuff Vista's got, just install Vista. Installing stuff like this will only cause more overhead. Come on people, Vista really isn't that bad. In fact, it's pretty darn good. And no, I'm not a big Vista fan, I used to hate Vista and I used to want Microsoft to burn.
But now I'm a happy Vista user and I prefer it over XP. Gaming goes very well, and the system is nice and snappy. It feels snappier and more solid than XP ever felt in all the years I used it.
Joshiii-Kun
Great post, Adam, and I've bookmarked this for future reference.
I agree with others here: The reason why I do not run Vista (despite owning 3 legit install DVD copies of it) is because I don't like all this crap, especially the so-called "eye candy", bogging down my system, ha! :)
But this list of Vista-like features is great, if you need any one of these Vista features but don't want to deal with Vista.
thewriteguy
@DMSaruman: bravo! well said.
ACF
@rand0mCreep:
that was completely uncalled for. I am a student, with much shorter hair than could be considered a mullet. :P
at any rate, I think that Vista is a waste of time. M$ just put it out there to keep up competition with Apple's new OSX's. Half the stuff that they put on there you don't even use. Every time I use my mom's (vista) computer, I sigh and try to turn off the idiotic sidebar and security advisor. to no avail.
At any rate, just because something new is released doesn't make the "older" think outmoded. 'cause sometimes, older is better.
like wine.
DMSaruman
@rand0mCreep:
Well, that Old Outdated system is more efficient than the "New Updated and fancy" one.
I prefer efficiency over "glass borders".
Danny
mmm, more animated crap on my pc? No, thanks. This kind of thing made me move from XP to win 2003, wich i use mainly for games (the couple of games I played had an increase in performance and framerates and still havent found any problems), and the rest goes for the glorious Slackware (and guess what, im using blackbox there)
Lman
You missed the only important feature (everybody will have to switch because of this :S):
Support for Flash-Harddiscs (or Hybrid-HD)
DreamFlasher
why would the poor mullet headed xp'ers want a vista look? they should be looking for employment and a clue. get off the old outdated operating system, open the classified, quit smoking and clean those used cars out...
rand0mCreep
Flip3D is by far one of the most useless things ever designed.
Urza
I would love to have Start++ for XP. For GTD, it's one of the best options but, unfortunately, developed only for Vista. Of course you can stick to Launchy, but Start++ is much better.
orkgandalf
I think the biggest thing about vista having all of the above features is that they are integrated (mostly) into the operating system. You don't have to run additional programs in the background, and wait another two minutes for all those excess startup programs to load. Now, perhaps because of this, Vista runs like a snail on speed; its fast, but it's still a snail.
josh.e.stroud
@ ShabazOSU
try this link, you need to patch the uxtheme.dll file now that you installed sp3 to use any transformation pack
[www.softpedia.com]
d00msay3r3
"Integrated Start Menu Search"
You overlooked what is, in my opinion, the best implementation out there.
FARR > *
It can be found here : [www.donationcoder.com]
stergil
@ thejynxed: Actually I should think you turned the argument away from course. Not that mine first comment wasn't a little itself but I didn't try to comment on various ups or downs just that I think the terminal is a plus for linux. You might note the later part where I point out that I wouldn't want to install all these little programs to bog my XP install down.
But to reply to your statement. No, I don't have many of the problems you mention. Most of my hardware does run "out of the box" as it were. The little things I tend to tinker with are more for my personal usage than need. You see, I enjoy writing small scripts to automate my wifi, my x configuration and such. I find it rewarding.
Now, before you get all pissed and such I have XP installed on this very machine I'm using to write this comment. I reboot and go to it for playing games as most of the games I like to play aren't supported in linux. Doesn't mean I'm going to use what I consider to be an inferior os all the time just because a part of my time on the computer is spent playing those games. I just dual boot instead. It takes a whole couple of mins to switch between which is something I can live with.
It would seem that doing that isn't something you have either considered or would find acceptable which is ok. You don't have to flame people for options. I didn't demand that everyone switch to linux. I pointed out my choice.
@ eternicode: You are probably right. It wasn't intended. My point was that I usually feel as though I am told by windows via gui what it will let me control where as with linux etc and cli I tell the machine how I want it to behave.
@ Kayin: Perhaps on a nice new machine that is the case. I can tell you from personal experience from trying vista and xp on this 3.0 Ghz, 3 Gigs of ram etc machine that vista ran much more sluggish than xp. I choose to keep a nice trim xp install running as it is much more responsive and better for playing games which is my only reason for having the install in the first place.
eskimobob
That was great, thanks Adam! Must have ignored most of these tools when they were first posted about, but having just upgraded to XP from Vista this is just what I needed. Installed a combo of AudioShell (from comments of InfoTag), QTTabBar, QTAddressBar and Xentient Thumbnails for now.
scuba04
@xint: Have you tried TaskSwitchXP? It provides the same functionality with less bling.
mljones1947
@thejynxed: Ok, it's not adding to the conversation and only adding to the OS flame war, but I feel I must say: You haven't used it recently, have you? tsk, tsk...another poor person stuck with windows because he refuses to retry things once every couple of years. Anyway, I'm considering giving windows XP another shot (I use vista at school, avoiding it like the plague now), just to see if I can find anything I like about it anymore. I'm sure I'll find something, and I'll definately use SOME of these if I like it.
kuroshi
@eternicode:
eh, you're getting overflow from gizmodo. And over there, I don't get the chance often.
*leaves quietly*
nutbastard
@K5Doom: This isn't a Linux post. You contributed less than nothing to this post.
berribrand
I'm actually trying to make vista look more like xp. I miss xp but my sister is using my copy right now :(
Swizzler121
@thejynxed:
I should've read your post prior to commenting, but yeah, I used the same theme from deviantART & once I installed SP3 it disappeared, and I have been unable to install it properly again.
ShabazOSU
My Vista transformation pack went bye-bye once I installed SP3..
ShabazOSU
@eskimobob: You do what you want, except the following:
Enable reliable wi-fi
Have reliable gaming
Run well on an average laptop
Print anything reliably
Reliable 3-D acceleration
Reliable hardware support in general
You probably (these I've done myself):
Cheer when the machine actually boots to a desktop instead of throwing up random X11/X.org errors
Faint when your printer actually works
Wonder why you have to use extremely ugly hacks (WINE/Cedega) to get any sort of functionality out of commonly used commercial software
Wonder at what time your wi-fi card will decide to stop working today without giving you any warning
Sigh in frustration as yet another game is Windows and Mac only
Wonder if there will ever be drivers available for your now several years old hardware
And the above are only a small portion of the reasons I stopped bothering with Linux.
Honestly now, this is a discussion about ways to make XP function more like Vista, not about how wonderful Linux is (and it is, just not on the desktop, or laptop either for that matter, but on servers and embedded devices, Linux is a god-send).
I've read all about the various features that Vista has, and other than using Teracopy to replace the buggy XP and Vista Explorer copy functionality, I can honestly say there isn't anything else worth having. I've tried eBoostr and QTTab - I just ended up using Process Explorer as my shell replacement under my work profile and running apps from there. eBoostr is ok , but having a second pagefile works just as well. My websurfing account (Limited User), I have all prettified with a patched uxtheme.dll and Luna Element 5 Black (found on deviantART).
thejynxed
Ohh, and 2 things missing in the list...
1. Being able to launch apps from your Quick Launch bar with winkey+1,2,3.. etc
2. The expand/resize options for partitions in the disk manager. It's extremely fast and easy. No need to resize to use gparted, etc.
guibom
@BillyGnSC: I don't think it has a virus... maybe it's just the exe packer. Check the report..
[img139.imageshack.us]
guibom
I have to wonder how much system resources (both system and video ram) would be chewed up if you added ALL of these utilities to XP and how much it would bog down a formerly speedy system. I'd rather have it all built into the OS already. I use Vista but would probably switch to Linux if I could be guaranteed that it would natively support ANY piece of hardware I want to use. For me, this is the best feature of Windows.
AlvinaCabaret
I agree with y3n0. The only reason i would ever switch to Vista, ever, is for the new sound mixer. It can control each applications volume output allowing, for instance, to silence every app (including chat apps and Firefox) and allow you to only have iTunes' sound on. I like this because at the moment I'm using my computer to play music on my electrostatic hi-fi stereo. and the other day almost blew my $20,000 setup because of Google chat blasting it's notification noise...
long winded i know, but this type of feature is becoming increasingly important to me. So, do you know of any application that would accomplish this?
Adian
what i find very funny is that after running vista for about 6 months now... i have had none of the errors that make it so "horrible." i mean sure some of the stuff has resource hogs, but good god if you read lifehacker you should be able to edit the reg files and just shut those down. i mean at first i hated vista on principal, but now whenever i have to use an XP machine i cant stand that it does not have half the features that i normally use...
and no i am not talking about that stupid Flip Aero interface...
SilberDrachi
IRT that "Better Rename" utility you have apparently pushed more than once: Virus identified: Worm/Autoit.QL
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!
Standard AVG caught this you assholes!
BillyGnSC
Please don't turn this into a OS Flame War - Each OS has it pro's and con's ranging from price, usability, and software. I like XP but I enjoy features on Ubuntu, OS X, and *GASP* Vista.
Darkmatter91
@nutbastard: This is a Windows post. Don't get me wrong, Linux+Compiz is great (I use it on my personal computer), but it's always nice to see Windows alternatives like this.
And, unless I'm mistaken, many tech-savvy lifehackers are at least aware of linux. No need to go fanboy here.
@njthomas: The Linux CLI may suck for some, but it's a lot more robust than the Windows CLI. Also, most daily-use programs are coming out with useful GUI configuration programs, constantly reducing the need to muck around the command line. When was the last time your tried linux?
@eskimobob: Just FYI, you're coming off kind of arrogant :)
eternicode
so uh, with all those mini applications to mimic vista, how much does xp get bogged down ?
contrary to popular belief, with all of vista's useless dings and whistles enabled, it loads and runs the same speed as xp.
@eskimobob: also, was always curious as to what you guys WANT do DO with your systems anyways ? no one has yet given me a solid answer as to why anyone would need to use linux or osx in a real world situation, aside from just a desire to do so. fyi, i have computers with ubuntu, osx, and vista, and rarely use the first two. one is just sitting as a php test server.
Kayin
Perhaps we should do an article on how to make Vista more like XP :)
spect3r
Re adding "breadcrumb navigation" to XP, I've used a context-menu add-on called Open Subfolder (get it at www.bubblepop.com/opensubfolder/index.html) which does a virtually identical job, but with one less toolbar. No idea which is more system-efficient, but the functions seem identical.
TheZenArcher
@njthomas: Well that guy, I have to disagree. I think you'll find that I like most UNIX/LINUX users instead of thinking that terminals suck instead think of the terminal as power. We can do what we WANT with OUR systems.
Also, I agree with every person here that mentioned not installing all this stuff to keep XP decent instead of the bloated mass that is vista.
eskimobob
Personally I would be very cautious adding some of this functionality to xp. You might just end up with inexplicable errors and certainly you'll end up with a system bogged down by unneeded crap-o-la. I just spent a couple of days sorting out a mysterious can't write to memory error on shutdown. It turned out to be FileboxExtender, which looks harmless enough, indeed it looks useful. Careful. Do a restore point, install and test for a while before making other changes, unless you don't care whether your system craps out on you. Live and learn.
philosopher_dog
The feature I'd like is Vista's ability to configure volume settings per application. I'd like to lower the audio on my browser especially when you run into those annoying websites with silly flash introductions with their oh-so-swank music.
y3n0
Just to be that guy, Linux sucks.
Actually, to be more precise, Linux is meh, Terminal sucks.
njthomas
Umm, that stuff is nice and all, but you're kind of forgetting the best part of Vista...
Mah Jong!
WMyers
@gottwhat and blacketj913: Thirded.
smitty1123
@What is a man?: Symlinks in XP can only make junctions for directories not for a file
zeusthrax
WHAT? you mean i can have some of the more mundane compiz effects, all while paying for my OS and exposing myself to viruses and malware, while using more RAM and lengthening my boot time? OH YEAH BABY, COUNT ME IN!
/sarcasm
nutbastard
remember when everyone hated xp because it a) was too "pretty" with its useless bubbly theme and sounds b) the installation was too large c) was a memory pig needing way more RAM than windows 2000 did d) was too buggy its funny how people forgot about how mch they were bashing xp when it first came out and now it's the greatest version of windows. remember these charts? "linux>win2000>xp Get over it and adapt every new operating system requires new hardware, stop being cheap asses. even ubuntu is a much bigger OS than a few years ago
FallonFeard
The maker of QT Tab Bar also made a QTAddressBar for breadcrumbs in Windows Explorer for Windows XP.
You could also mention that if using nLite, there is an option to use the uxtheme patch to enable unsigned themes.
You could mention that to get the fonts used in Vista, you would need Office 2007 or at least the free Powerpoint 2007 Viewer.
Lastly, you could say that on deviantart, there is a way to patch XP's bootscreen to look like Vista's. The modified bootscreen can be found on DeviantArt, I believe, along with VistaVG, which I feel is the most complete Vista-ish visual style available.
There is also a program out there called True Transparency designed to bring Aero-like transparency to XP.
tap52384
@johnsmith1234:
thank you, i will try this out tonight!
works well for external hdd's as well?
hooligans
@MrBlahBlah: Agreed. In all honesty, if you want all this stuff? Just run Vista. By the time you get done adding all this to XP, I would be shocked if it wasn't more resource hungry than Vista is in it's default state.
Nice thing about this stuff is that you can pick and choose though. For instance, the Breadcrumb nav is nice, as is the improved launch functionality. So just grab both of those and leave all the extra noise behind.
@zeusthrax: Symlinks are available in XP. Check it here: [shell-shocked.org]
What is a man?
@hooligans: Teracopy
How about changing standby for the hybrid standby/hibernation?
johnsmith1234
What about Symbolic Link feature in new NTFS under vista? I have hard and soft link all over for programs which do not allow me to change the default location where they store data, configuration. I think that is one feature which made me move to Vista from XP.
zeusthrax
....for years I have been puzzled as to HOW the 3D Flip thingy is an actual feature... it's eye candy.
xint
excellent post! Thanks Adam. Dugg it!
qrius
i quite enjoy the fact that on vista when you transfer files from folders/computer, it provides actual details (rate of transfer, amount sent/total) and would love to have this on XP
any good ideas?
hooligans
I'd just be happy if someone could find a way to give my users a 'Are you sure' type of prompt when they try to drag and drop network folders. Despite this being built into the Server 2003 service pack 2, MS seems unable or unwilling to give this back to us (was in the original release, had a registry hack for 2000, and part of 98), where if you dragged and dropped folders or files on a network drive, you would be asked to confirm. Would cut down a TON of headaches for us network admins! (locking them down won't work due to the users' need to work in files and drives) I dread the day Management says "Vista has this...we implement today!"
neonate
I use the Vista Inspirat Brico pack from crystalxp.net to give Vista style theming/appearance. My manager asked me just yesterday if I had Vista installed when he saw it.
ihakes
for anyone who wants thumbnails of their RAW files there is also a plugin for xp from MS that allows this and also allows them to be opened larger in a preview type window. I foudn it on the microsoft prefessional photography website.
jeepngeek
I can't find any good uxtheme replacements, even on deviantart. Anyone know of a good place to find them?
rabiddachshund
@K5Doom: Wow what a surprise; another useless linux comment. Speaking of which, how about Ubuntu's complete lack of decen... OH, that's right, this isn't a post about Linux.
On topic, I use remote desktop frequently and Vista's added drag and drop for files across sessions definitely makes things easier. I know there are VNC alternatives, but none of them look nearly as good or operate as smoothly as the built in RDP.
cdoggwsu