Leopard
Posted by Gina Trapani at 11:30 AM on December 4, 2007
Undocumented code in Leopard looks like it's set up to load Windows application files--prompting rumours that that Mac of yours will be able to run Windows programs natively someday.
Undocumented code in Leopard looks like it's set up to load Windows application files--prompting rumours that that Mac of yours will be able to run Windows programs natively someday.
Road Worrier Road Tests The A380
Five Best Desktop Customisation Tools
Top 10 Things You Can Do With A DVD
Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
sjwgator
Posted 8:38 AM 4/12/07
Just one question about that . . . why the hell would I EVER want to run a Windows program on a Mac? Isn't that like saying jumbo shrimp?
sjwgator
razordu30
Posted 9:37 AM 4/12/07
@sjwgator: Different uses for different people. My boss installed Parallels and it's the only way he can run Quickbooks Online or SmartDraw. I myself am on Linux, and if it wasn't for Wine and VMWare, I wouldn't have AutoCAD, Yahoo Music Unlimited, Picasa, or Photoshop.
Some people don't want to limit their software selection.
razordu30
ronocdh
Posted 9:02 AM 4/12/07
@sjwgator: Have you ever worked in an office? There are a lot of programs available for Windows and not for Mac, although I believe Linux is filling in on alternatives much faster than Apple and the Mac software community are.
ronocdh
Floydpink
Posted 8:35 PM 4/12/07
After sorting through quite a bit of speculation on this, I read an explanation that I believe makes the most sense. The theory is that Apple may have added this code to allow .NET executables to run on Mac. That would actually make a lot of sense, especially given that .NET is actually an open standard, not something solely owned by Microsoft.
I don't think (I hope not) Apple has any desire to natively run Windows executables. Parallels and such are as close as I think they ever want those apps coming to their system.
Floydpink