<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lifehacker Australia &#187; bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tags/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bing&#8217;s Brute Force Approach To Blocking Video Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2010/03/bings-brute-force-approach-to-blocking-video-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2010/03/bings-brute-force-approach-to-blocking-video-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=355003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google offers SafeSearch to stop offensive content popping up on your workplace computer or in front of the kids, and Microsoft&#8217;s rival search engine Bing has a similarly-labelled option. But while Google&#8217;s system can distinguish between images and text in videos, Bing seems to take a much less subtle approach: if a video sounds remotely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2010/03/bings-brute-force-approach-to-blocking-video-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Promises Some Proper Aussie Localisation Next Year</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/bing-promises-some-proper-aussie-localisation-next-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/bing-promises-some-proper-aussie-localisation-next-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=347294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the more longlasting criticisms of Bing, Microsoft&#8217;s wannabe Google rival, is the lack of localisation on actual useful features, as opposed to just offering pretty background images. There hasn&#8217;t been much action on the front so far, but allegedly things will improve in 2010.
The mobile version of Bing lacks much Aussie relevance, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/bing-promises-some-proper-aussie-localisation-next-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prevent Google, Bing And Yahoo From Tracking Your Clicks</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/10/prevent-google-bing-and-yahoo-from-tracking-your-clicks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/10/prevent-google-bing-and-yahoo-from-tracking-your-clicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=344230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every time you click results in Google, Yahoo or Bing, a special URL tracks your click&#8212;and makes it annoying to copy and paste. The CyberNet blog runs down click-track-preventing tools for all three search engines.
On the Google side, CyberNet recommends a familiar Greasemonkey Script and extension, both of which we&#8217;ve covered before. CyberNet&#8217;s post goes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/10/prevent-google-bing-and-yahoo-from-tracking-your-clicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZapBing Rotates Your Desktop Wallpaper With High Quality Bing Images</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/09/zapbing-rotates-your-desktop-wallpaper-with-high-quality-bing-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/09/zapbing-rotates-your-desktop-wallpaper-with-high-quality-bing-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallpaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=342101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows only: If you&#8217;re a fan of the high quality photographs regularly rotating on the Bing homepage, free application ZapBing brings a rotating lineup of those images to your desktop wallpaper.
(Click the image above for a closer look.)
The site&#8217;s in French, so I&#8217;ve linked to both the original version and the translated English version below. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/09/zapbing-rotates-your-desktop-wallpaper-with-high-quality-bing-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decide Which Search Engine You Really Prefer</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/08/decide-which-search-engine-you-really-prefer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/08/decide-which-search-engine-you-really-prefer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=339660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unable to choose between Google and Bing? That&#8217;s OK&#8212;these three mashups display results from both search engines in handy side-by-side frames and make life simpler for the indecisive.
If you want to spend some time figuring out which engine you really prefer, one of these mashups is a good place to start. The premise of these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/08/decide-which-search-engine-you-really-prefer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blind Search Reveals Which Engine You Really Prefer</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/08/blind-search-reveals-which-engine-you-really-prefer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/08/blind-search-reveals-which-engine-you-really-prefer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=339399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you saw blind results for your search terms from Google, Bing and pre-Bing-partnership Yahoo, would you always choose Google? The Blind Search site lets you take a blind taste test of all three search engines and pick your winner.
That&#8217;s all the site does&#8212;remove all the branding and layout and provide straight-up search results from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/08/blind-search-reveals-which-engine-you-really-prefer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Hotspots Still Have That Yankee Feel</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/bing-hotspots-still-have-that-yankee-feel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/bing-hotspots-still-have-that-yankee-feel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Microsoft&#8217;s latest addition to the local version of its Bing search engine is &#8220;hot spots&#8221; offering trivia about its background image. So why did New York get highlighted on the first day?
There are plenty of Bing features which Australians didn&#8217;t get access to at launch, and the hot spots &#8212; which offer trivia links relating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/bing-hotspots-still-have-that-yankee-feel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Adds Some Twitter To Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/bing-adds-some-twitter-to-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/bing-adds-some-twitter-to-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the alleged selling points for Microsoft&#8217;s Bing search engine is more relevant results, so adding in recent posts from Twitter is an obvious thing to do.
Rather than aiming for full-blown Twitter indexing &#8212; something Twitter itself has taken a while to get working &#8212; Bing is indexing the results of &#8220;prominent&#8221; Twitterers, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/bing-adds-some-twitter-to-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Suggests Eyeballs Like Bing, But Google&#8217;s Familiar</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/study-suggests-eyeballs-like-bing-but-googles-familiar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/study-suggests-eyeballs-like-bing-but-googles-familiar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A usability research firm, the Catalyst Group, performed one of those amazingly geeky (and neat) eyeball tracking studies on 12 people conducting searches. The results, combined with a survey, suggest that while Bing won out in layout, design  and filtering, and drew more eyes to the top (i.e. sponsored results), Google familiarity and relevance [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/study-suggests-eyeballs-like-bing-but-googles-familiar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Maps Birds Eye View Gives Different Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/bing-maps-birds-eye-view-gives-different-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/bing-maps-birds-eye-view-gives-different-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The limited search capabilities on Bing Maps, Microsoft&#8217;s web map system, might make it look like a poor cousin to Google, but it does have one interesting feature the Big G lacks &#8212; a bird&#8217;s-eye view of selected Australian cities.
Google&#8217;s similar-but-different Street View has a much wider range of coverage, but the angled view offered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/bing-maps-birds-eye-view-gives-different-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
