<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lifehacker Australia &#187; ad blocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tags/ad-blocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Says It&#8217;s OK With Ad-Blocking Extensions</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/google-says-its-ok-with-ad-blocking-extensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/google-says-its-ok-with-ad-blocking-extensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad blocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=347977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might think Google would find the fast-growing number and popularity of ad-blocking extensions for Chrome problematic, given that the search firm rises and falls on advertising revenue. 
But an engineering director for Google said at a conference last week that, while the company thinks about ad blocking &#8220;a lot&#8221;, it&#8217;s not something that needs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/12/google-says-its-ok-with-ad-blocking-extensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 8&#8217;s InPrivate Feature Is A Competent Ad Blocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/internet-explorer-8s-inprivate-feature-is-a-competent-ad-blocker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/internet-explorer-8s-inprivate-feature-is-a-competent-ad-blocker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad blocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=333571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apart from loading web pages, there&#8217;s one thing that most of our readers want their browser to do: Block annoying advertisements. Web site Neowin points out that Internet Explorer 8&#8217;s InPrivate feature does just that.
Granted, if you&#8217;re a Firefox user, you&#8217;ve already got the beloved Adblock Plus (one of our top 10 must-have Firefox extensions). [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/internet-explorer-8s-inprivate-feature-is-a-competent-ad-blocker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdSweep Ad Blocker Gets Easier Chrome Installation</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/adsweep-ad-blocker-gets-easier-chrome-installation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/adsweep-ad-blocker-gets-easier-chrome-installation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Purdy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad blocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=332860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously mentioned ad blocker AdSweep has updated its home page and bundled its user extension to make installation on Google Chrome much more simple.
If you&#8217;re using the &#8220;Developer Channel&#8221; version of Google Chrome (enabled by downloading and running the User Channel Switcher), AdSweep has been bundled up as a single .crx file you can install [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/adsweep-ad-blocker-gets-easier-chrome-installation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlimmerBlocker Blocks Ads System-Wide</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/glimmerblocker_blocks_ads_systemwide-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/glimmerblocker_blocks_ads_systemwide-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad blocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/12/25/glimmerblocker_blocks_ads_systemwide-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mac OS X only: Free, open-source application GlimmerBlocker adds a new preference pane to your System Preferences that brings system-wide ad blocking to your Mac. Just install GlimmerBlocker and let it do its work. You can add custom filters, track your ad-blocking history, and even allow your iPhone or iPod touch to use the GlimmerBlocker [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/glimmerblocker_blocks_ads_systemwide-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
