Why Rent-To-Own Retail Purchasing Isn’t Worth It 

Why Rent-To-Own Retail Purchasing Isn’t Worth It 

If you’re short on cash and you need a fridge or furniture, you might be tempted at “rent-to-own” options. These are appliance and furniture stores that let customers pay for items over time by forking over a monthly amount. But Consumer Reports illustrates why this is a pretty terrible idea.

They break it down in the above video, but their money editor, Mandy Walker, puts it in pretty simple terms:

If these were loans, the equivalent interest rate would be between 50% and 150%. There’s lots of fine print in the ads and in contracts, and many consumers just don’t realise the full cost.

With a typical plan, you might make monthly payments for two years before buying the appliance at a listed cash price. Consumer Reports found that some of these plans end up costing consumers hundreds of dollars more over time than just paying for the item outright.

It’s a classic debt trap, and one that they explain more in the linked article below.

What You Should Know About Rent-To-Own Retail Models: Extra Costs, High Interest Rates [Consumer Reports]


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

Here are the cheapest plans available for Australia’s most popular NBN speed tier.

At Lifehacker, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.

Comments


2 responses to “Why Rent-To-Own Retail Purchasing Isn’t Worth It ”

Leave a Reply