Honour, Honourable, Honorary: Another Messy Exception You Need To Learn

In Australian English, we spell 'honour' with a 'u', and take the same approach for 'honourable' and and 'honourably'. However, when it comes to the word 'honorary', the 'u' disappears.

Messy picture from Shutterstock

It's yet another of those annoying glitches in spelling you have no choice but to learn by rote. We also use the u-free spelling for 'honorarium' and 'honorific', but I suspect 'honorary' is the word you'll encounter most often.

This is one case where US English spelling is more consistent: since Americans spell 'honour' without a 'u' as 'honor' in all circumstances, there's no exception to learn here. However, that doesn't mean you can apply the principle in reverse and start using 'honourary' in Australia. Indeed, it seems more likely that in the future, we'll see the US spelling become more common in other contexts — but for plain old 'honour' as a noun, we haven't crossed that barrier yet, so you need to know when to use a 'u' and when to leave it out.

Ultimately, English spelling is not consistent in any version, and everyone simply has to learn the exceptions. Accuracy matters.

Lifehacker's Mind Your Language column offers bossy advice on improving your writing.


Comments

    Check the title, "Honarary".

      D'oh! Muphry's Law strikes again. (slaps self with wet branch)

    When i visited Australia on a working holiday in 1955 about half, it seemed, of the newspapers, magazines, and books omitted the u: honor, color, ardor, labor, etc.

    I was impressed then; on a recent visit i was not.

    Now it seems only the Labor Party has kept the faith.

    US spelling is only minimally more consistent than the UK version. Only a few dozen words have more predictable spellings in American English (traveled, center). In US English at least 4,000 words still have unpredictable spellings, just as in UK English: http://englishspellingproblems.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/irregular-spellings-in-4217-common-words_7864.html.

    The -or endings are a letter shorter than the -our ones, but still irregular. The main pattern is -er, in several hundred words (e.g. brother, potter, winner, fibber, grabber). Their -ize endings merely undermine the main pattern for a final /z/ sound which is -se (rise, rose, wise). They were adopted to make US spelling different, not better.

    Their best change was to reduce the 'to practise - a practice' differentiation to just 'practice'. All the 333 heterographs for identical words like 'there/their', 'it's/it's', 'to/too/two' do nothing but waste school time. Over 2000 English words with several meanings have just one spelling (mean, lean, sound) and cause no difficulties whatsoever. The heterographs merely ensure that learning to write English takes far longer than need be and not too many people become confident writers.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now