Data Quality Is Still An Issue For Big Data

You often hear the argument that data quality isn’t a major concern in big data projects, since the volume of information being analysed can smooth over any problems. However, Forrester researcher Michele Goetz points out this doesn’t mean IT shouldn’t work hard to ensure the data is as accurate as possible.

Quality control picture from Shutterstock

In a blog post, Goetz notes that “analysis can fill gaps by emphasising pattern recognition over master data”. That’s especially common in marketing, where data sources are often sketchy.

Despite that, it would be a mistake to use this as an excuse to minimise data quality efforts, she suggests:

IT still needs to support and certify data quality in the access and integration of data. It isn’t a question of good enough data, it is about data quality efforts that matter to outcomes.

Good point. Hit the full post to read more, and check out our top 10 rules for working with big data for more insights.

Data quality and data science are not polar opposites [Forrester Blogs]


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

Here are the cheapest plans available for Australia’s most popular NBN speed tier.

At Lifehacker, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.

Comments


One response to “Data Quality Is Still An Issue For Big Data”