Lifehacker's Guide To 64-Bit Vs 32-Bit Operating Systems

You're probably aware that 64-bit and 32-bit versions of your operating system exist, but apart from ascribing to a bigger-is-better philosophy, you may have no idea what separates the two. The question: Should you use a 64-bit version of Windows, and if so, why?

More and more frequently, users are installing the 64-bit version of their operating system of choice over the less capable 32-bit version. But most people don't really have a full understanding of what the difference really is. Below, we're taking a look at the most important differences so you can better understand what you gain (and potentially lose) if you upgrade to the 64-bit version of your OS. (The post focuses on Windows.)

We've already explained whether you really need 4GB of RAM, a question that touches on the 64-bit issue, but now let's tackle it in more detail.

Which Version Do I Have?

To figure out which version of Windows you are running, just head into the System properties in Control Panel, or you can take the easy route and right-click on your Computer icon in the start menu or desktop, and choose Properties from the menu. Windows 7 or Vista users will be able to check the System type in the list, while the few XP users with 64-bit will see it on the dialog.

Keep in mind that your CPU must support 64-bit in order to be running a 64-bit operating system — if you're running a modern CPU you should be fine, but some of the budget PCs don't include a 64-bit processor.

Does 32-Bit Really Have A Memory Limit?

In any 32-bit operating system, you are limited to 4096MB of RAM simply because the size of a 32-bit value will not allow any more. On a 32-bit system, each process is given 4GB of virtual memory to play with, which is separated into 2GB of user space that the application can actually use at a time.

Savvy readers might point out that modern chips support PAE, a processor technology that allows the operating system to use a little bit more memory — up to 64GB, but it also requires special application support that most applications don't have or necessarily need.

A common misconception is that this is a Windows-specific problem, when in fact 32-bit Linux and Mac OS X have the same limitations and the same workarounds. 32-bit Linux uses a mapping table to allow access to the extra memory, and OS X Snow Leopard actually ships by default with a 32-bit kernel that can't access all the memory on older systems, even though most of the rest of the OS runs 64-bit processes.

The 4GB limit for Windows, at least, is also a factor of licensing — the home versions of 32-bit Windows, while technically being able to support PAE, have a hard limit of 4GB for licensing and driver compatibility reasons.

More Problems with 32-Bit

Not only does 32-bit have a hard limit for the amount of memory it can address, there's also another problem: your devices, like your video card and motherboard BIOS take up room in that same 4GB space, which means the underlying operating system gets access to even less of your RAM.

Windows expert Mark Russinovich found that a desktop running 32-bit Windows with 4GB of RAM and two 1GB video cards only had 2.2GB of RAM available for the operating system — so the bigger and better your video cards get, the less of that 4GB will be accessible on a 32-bit system.

What's Different About 64-Bit?

While 32 bits of information can only access 4GB of RAM, a 64-bit machine can access 17.2 BILLION gigabytes of system memory, banishing any limits far into the future. This also means that your video cards and other devices will not be stealing usable memory space from the operating system. Windows 64-bit Home editions are still limited to 16GB of RAM for licensing reasons, but the Professional and Ultimate versions can use up to 192GB of RAM, so keep that in mind when building that killer system.

The per-process limit is also greatly increased — on 64-bit Windows, instead of a 2GB limit, each application has access to 8TB of virtual memory without any special API, a huge factor when you consider applications like video editing or virtual machines that may need to use enormous amounts of RAM.

On Windows, the 64-bit versions also come with a technology to prevent hijacking the kernel, support for hardware-enabled data execution protection, and mandatory digitally signed 64-bit device drivers. You also won't be able to use your 16-bit apps anymore, which hardly seems like a loss.

Do 32-bit Applications Work On 64-Bit?

The vast majority of your 32-bit applications will continue to work just fine on 64-bit Windows, which includes a compatibility layer called WoW64, which actually switches the processor back and forth between 32-bit and 64-bit modes depending on which thread needs to execute — making 32-bit software run smoothly even in the 64-bit environment.

There are some exceptions to that rule, however: 32-bit device drivers and low-level system applications like Antivirus, shell extensions that plug into Windows, and some media applications simply won't work without a 64-bit equivalent.

In practice, the vast majority of your favourite applications will either continue to work, or provide a 64-bit version you can use instead — but you should check to make sure.

Does 64-Bit Use Double the RAM?

A common misconception about 64-bit Windows is the amount of RAM that is actually used — some people seem to think it will use double the RAM, while others incorrectly assume a 64-bit system will be twice as fast as 32-bit.

While it's true that 64-bit processes will take a little extra memory, that is a result of the memory pointers being a little bigger to address the larger amount of RAM, and not an actual double in size. Imagine, if you will, an ancient library filing system that has a card to tell you where to find the book in the library — if you got a bigger box to hold the cards, the library would not double in size, you'd just be able to find the book you were looking for more easily.

What will increase with 64-bit Windows is the amount of drive space needed for the operating system — with a compatibility layer in place, the base OS will take up a few extra GBs of space, though with today's massive hard drives that should hardly be a concern.

The Bottom Line, Which Should I Use?

If you are ordering a new PC with 4GB or more of RAM, you should probably be running a 64-bit version of Windows so you can use all of the available memory, especially if you want a rig with a large video card — just keep in mind that the Home versions only support 16GB of RAM (for most people a 16GB limit won't be a problem, but it's worth keeping in mind).

If you're running Mac OS X, you don't need to worry about 32-bit vs 64-bit, and if you're running Linux, you probably know this stuff already.

What about you? Have you made the switch to a 64-bit operating system? Let's hear what you're using, and how long you've been living the 64-bit life, in the comments.


    The biggest downside is that my newish Canon laser printer has no 64 bit drivers (I suspect the same for my Epson inkjet but haven't looked yet), so I have to keep one 32bit PC online just to print to it. grrr

    When upgrading to Windows 7, i had the Choice 32 or 64bit. I went 32 because Visual Studio/.net framework doesn't support edit and continue under 64bit and i like my edit and continue when developing as it can take 5mins to recompile and i want to change a (for example).

    When they fix that issue, ill be all over 64bit like a rash.

      Tim: In your project configuration, change your platform from "any cpu" to "x86" and it will force the project to use the 32bit CLR, and you'll have edit and continue working on windows x64. It means your app will be 32bit and not 64bit, but unless its a serious industrial strength program you probably don't need x64 - and you could always turn it back to "any cpu" for the release build anyway.

        That's what we tried, but the 30 project solution doesn't seem to like that and it takes a lot of mucking about (30+ mins) to get rid of the build errors.

        I wish LH sent reply emails i would have got back sooner, i only just stumbled across this bookmarked :S

    I've been using 64 bit Vista for about a year. No real problems but no real advantages I can really notice either. One annoyance though is the new Foxtel download doesn't support 64 bit. That's their fault however, not Microsoft's (for a change!)

    Made the switch to 64 when windows 7 was released. I am never going back to 32.

    I'm a young'un saving up for 7, and I am so going 64 bit when I finally buy it.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now