
Want the short version, sketched out on a notepad, uploaded as a video and narrated with a carefree tenor? Here’s Google’s explanation:
Want the much more in-depth, screenshot-by-screenshot rundown of what was (not really) revealed? Check out Gizmodo’s live-blogged announcement.
Google released Chrome OS’ source code today, but one of Chrome’s lead engineers, Idan Avraham, said a finished Chrome OS arrives “about a year from today”. They took pains to note that Google itself won’t be offering Chrome OS as a download to install on any system you have. They’re developing Chrome OS for machines with “specific reference hardware”, as their machines will boot directly from those machines and skip a lot of the hardware checking steps that standard operating systems run through.
The developers didn’t offer pricing hints or targets from hardware partners. They did say, however, that they intend to “push” manufacturers to release netbooks with larger keyboards and mousepads, and crisper resolutions, and devices will be released “in the price ranges people see today”.

From a single boot-up shown on a livecast, and some live demonstration, pretty darned fast. The lead developer cited a seven-second boot-up to a universal sign-on screen on an eeePC, and then to the desktop after another four seconds. It does this by working on specialised firmware, written for hardware Chrome OS’ developers work with, and relying on a Google Chrome browser written specifically for the Chrome OS. It’s also written exclusively to run on solid-state or non-hard-disk drives, with a minimal amount of locally-stored data.

For you, the user, nothing entirely whole-cloth new. But a whole lot of interesting bits:

Not exactly. Avraham demonstrated the OS’ ability to assign specific web apps to different files and links by clicking an .xls (Microsoft Excel) file, which then opened in Microsoft’s online Office suite.
Eventually, assuming it gains any foothold in the market. Chrome’s developers said their primary focus for the year, and the immediate future, would be netbooks, and that laptops and desktop releases would follow, without offering any specific time frame.
Oh, right — Avraham said “you will be able to print”, but said the OS would take a “more innovative approach” to supporting printers. More to come.
So, how does Google Chrome OS strike you? Is it something you’d want on a netbook, or were you expecting something more? Share what you saw, and see coming, in the comments.

StevoTheDevo
November 20, 2009 at 8:21 AM
Pretty much how I expected it to be actually..
Report PermalinkThe first, true Cloud Computing device.
Presumably it’ll come with an inbuilt SIM card slot and WiFi.. And will largely be sold like a mobile phone through mobile network stores.
Chris Lowery
November 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Its not a physical product… I’d be suprised if it was sold anywhere..
Report PermalinkVincent Lui
November 20, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Is there an offline mode ?
Report PermalinkMike
December 12, 2009 at 10:32 AM
No usable offline mode. Initially I had to connect via ethernet so I could enter my 802.11 wireless password.
If you have any local media (audio, video, images) forget about it. At the end of the day, it’s a very restrictive Ubuntu with a 2.6.30 kernel. For the same sized live image… better to go with Ubuntu Netbook Remix. Unless you work for a fridge manufacturer wanting to put an LCD in a fridge door…
Report Permalinkblot0
November 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM
I think that is really nice and all.. and might work great for Americans moving everything online.
But with small caps and restricted bandwidth I cant see how moving everything to the web will be able to be used by any of us over here in Australia.
Report PermalinkAlvin Rubyono
November 20, 2009 at 10:54 AM
It’ll probably work with TPG’s current plan of 100GB (incl. offpeak) for $49 bucks. At least Australian bandwidth is getting more and more affordable.
Report Permalinkmarztar
November 20, 2009 at 1:29 PM
Hey is TPG worth getting?
Report PermalinkOptus is sucking atm and they don’t offer large bandwith.
Ben
November 20, 2009 at 3:43 PM
With a download limit I’m kind of worried about this.
Report Permalinkgregor
November 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Hmm, looks like the Litl easel (www.litl.com) which is here now. Local cache flash; everything on the web.
I think they’re right that most people don’t need a computer, they just need an information appliance.
Report PermalinkVladimir Volinov
November 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM
It is solely cloud computing, so it strikes me as a complete waste of time for any Australian Home or Personal Use. It might be OK for Business.
Ask yourself this, how much data, personal or otherwise do you want to trust to the cloud.
Now if it was an OS, the way Windows, Snow Leopard and Unix and Linux derivations it might be worthwhile.
Report PermalinkJonathan
November 24, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Could not agree more… I would not trust my data in the hands of another company I know nothing about how it’s secured, who has access to it, how good there backups are..etc..etc.. At least when I turn off my PC at home I know there is absolutely no way any one can get in remotely, I keep good backups of my data and when I need something it will always be there and I’m not relying on an internet connection to be up… Another thing, I can’t see this working in Australia with our flaky, slow and limited internet connections that we have at the moment either… Just my 2c worth….
Does not interest me in the slitest at this point in time!
Report Permalink