<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Outlines Plans For Chrome OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Watford</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11468</link>
		<dc:creator>David Watford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11468</guid>
		<description>Google have seen a bit of a gap in the market which is currently filled by Windows XP on netbooks. They will develop something lightweight, quick booting and secure that will also serve as a thin client for their web apps. 

As for novel, OS development stopped 30 years ago.  It is just Sun&#039;s old thin client idea now called The Cloud. Chrome OS will be knocked together in under a year with a Linux kernel (based on 1970s Unix ideas), an existing graphics system and existing web browser. 

Apple&#039;s systems are based on the old Mach microkernel and BSD. 

It is Microsoft after the Vista debarcle who are putting R&amp;D into new operating systems to solve their problems. Microkernels, systems designed to operate on multiple cores, secure systems, less hardware management for mobile devices etc have been developed by Microsoft. And from Windows 7 onwards you will start to see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google have seen a bit of a gap in the market which is currently filled by Windows XP on netbooks. They will develop something lightweight, quick booting and secure that will also serve as a thin client for their web apps. </p>
<p>As for novel, OS development stopped 30 years ago.  It is just Sun&#8217;s old thin client idea now called The Cloud. Chrome OS will be knocked together in under a year with a Linux kernel (based on 1970s Unix ideas), an existing graphics system and existing web browser. </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s systems are based on the old Mach microkernel and BSD. </p>
<p>It is Microsoft after the Vista debarcle who are putting R&amp;D into new operating systems to solve their problems. Microkernels, systems designed to operate on multiple cores, secure systems, less hardware management for mobile devices etc have been developed by Microsoft. And from Windows 7 onwards you will start to see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11398</guid>
		<description>You know gOS has nothing to do with google apart from integrating google gadgets into it&#039;s install, right?
It&#039;s just another Linux distribution, alot like ubuntu but with a few minor changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know gOS has nothing to do with google apart from integrating google gadgets into it&#8217;s install, right?<br />
It&#8217;s just another Linux distribution, alot like ubuntu but with a few minor changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik Chemburkar</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11247</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik Chemburkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11247</guid>
		<description>Google is going to take this step by step, so I&#039;m not expecting something big initially, but I expect them to build a good and OS from core, hope that its not just another linux distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is going to take this step by step, so I&#8217;m not expecting something big initially, but I expect them to build a good and OS from core, hope that its not just another linux distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11246</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11246</guid>
		<description>bit behind the times?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOS_(operating_system)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bit behind the times?<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOS_(operating_system)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOS_(operating_system)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mentallyimpaired</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11242</link>
		<dc:creator>mentallyimpaired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11242</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to it! Love using Chrome as a browser, and like the fact that all this competition is brilliant for us, the end consumer! 

However I&#039;d have hoped to see Android develop more on netbooks before going further - mind you, as a &#039;barebones&#039; netbook OS, it may just turn out to be an amazing concept!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to it! Love using Chrome as a browser, and like the fact that all this competition is brilliant for us, the end consumer! </p>
<p>However I&#8217;d have hoped to see Android develop more on netbooks before going further &#8211; mind you, as a &#8216;barebones&#8217; netbook OS, it may just turn out to be an amazing concept!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liatach</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11231</link>
		<dc:creator>liatach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11231</guid>
		<description>Been using chrome since launch,
Firefox looks like it may catch up with its next major update, not going back in a hurry.
I&#039;m Looking forward to seeing it working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been using chrome since launch,<br />
Firefox looks like it may catch up with its next major update, not going back in a hurry.<br />
I&#8217;m Looking forward to seeing it working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11227</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how to take this, it seems Google is starting to lose focus, there core business search engine is becoming dated and there Chrome browser still needs allot of work. Perhaps they should put more work into those and get them strong before taking even more on?

I always thought of Google as a strong leader in it&#039;s fields (search, maps..etc) but they are becoming like everyone else and offering not much more other than an inferior alternative to what is already available</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how to take this, it seems Google is starting to lose focus, there core business search engine is becoming dated and there Chrome browser still needs allot of work. Perhaps they should put more work into those and get them strong before taking even more on?</p>
<p>I always thought of Google as a strong leader in it&#8217;s fields (search, maps..etc) but they are becoming like everyone else and offering not much more other than an inferior alternative to what is already available</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11220</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s vaporware</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s vaporware</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr-crash</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/07/google-outlines-plans-for-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-11201</link>
		<dc:creator>mr-crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=337371#comment-11201</guid>
		<description>This should be interesting.

But, i&#039;d love to see some more work put into Chrome as a browser (like extensions!), particularly if it&#039;s to be the base for which I use even more features of my computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be interesting.</p>
<p>But, i&#8217;d love to see some more work put into Chrome as a browser (like extensions!), particularly if it&#8217;s to be the base for which I use even more features of my computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
