<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Firefox 3.5 Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/top-10-firefox-35-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/top-10-firefox-35-features/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/top-10-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10517</link>
		<dc:creator>Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336559#comment-10517</guid>
		<description>Items 3, 8, 9 and 10 were sourced directly form Opera.

6 is from IE or Safari (i think IE was first)

2 has been incorporated by each vendor with different format support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Items 3, 8, 9 and 10 were sourced directly form Opera.</p>
<p>6 is from IE or Safari (i think IE was first)</p>
<p>2 has been incorporated by each vendor with different format support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/top-10-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10488</link>
		<dc:creator>Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336559#comment-10488</guid>
		<description>Faster loading times would be a plus. I love Chrome, but from a productivity point of view it&#039;s FF all the way. With all the snazzy plugins and these latest upgrades, I am more than happy to keep using FF for all of my needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faster loading times would be a plus. I love Chrome, but from a productivity point of view it&#8217;s FF all the way. With all the snazzy plugins and these latest upgrades, I am more than happy to keep using FF for all of my needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/top-10-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10476</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336559#comment-10476</guid>
		<description>Smarter seesion restore? That is an awesome feature I have had FF crash due to one site and when I reload it simply brings back that same damaged site. Since I usually have a big number of tabs open, now I won&#039;t have to reopen every single site all over again...cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smarter seesion restore? That is an awesome feature I have had FF crash due to one site and when I reload it simply brings back that same damaged site. Since I usually have a big number of tabs open, now I won&#8217;t have to reopen every single site all over again&#8230;cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
