<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Browser Comparison Chart Offends Anyone Who&#8217;s Ever Used Another Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:40:24 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ridgway</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10472</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ridgway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10472</guid>
		<description>bwabaahahaa *sniff sniff*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bwabaahahaa *sniff sniff*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10467</link>
		<dc:creator>Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10467</guid>
		<description>More dumbness, from a company of dummies. I honestly can&#039;t believe their non-sense. The fact that they even have a standards compliant browser that even works half decently now is a complete miracle (they must have hired a smart person for that job).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More dumbness, from a company of dummies. I honestly can&#8217;t believe their non-sense. The fact that they even have a standards compliant browser that even works half decently now is a complete miracle (they must have hired a smart person for that job).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10458</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10458</guid>
		<description>I heard IE 8 is so stable it didn&#039;t crash even once while downloading the latest version of Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard IE 8 is so stable it didn&#8217;t crash even once while downloading the latest version of Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brb8two</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10455</link>
		<dc:creator>Brb8two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10455</guid>
		<description>If you Read &quot; Myth #4: Internet Explorer doesn&#039;t play well with Web standards. &quot;

The Explanation of that sections Proves why IE8 is only checked in the &quot;Compatibility&quot; section.

&quot;Internet Explorer 8 is more compatible with more sites on the Internet than any other browser. &quot;

i.e. websites previously had to be coded for web standard and IE, now it will not have to be and the old version will still work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you Read &#8221; Myth #4: Internet Explorer doesn&#8217;t play well with Web standards. &#8221;</p>
<p>The Explanation of that sections Proves why IE8 is only checked in the &#8220;Compatibility&#8221; section.</p>
<p>&#8220;Internet Explorer 8 is more compatible with more sites on the Internet than any other browser. &#8221;</p>
<p>i.e. websites previously had to be coded for web standard and IE, now it will not have to be and the old version will still work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubens Peculis</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10453</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubens Peculis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10453</guid>
		<description>Simply abhorrent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply abhorrent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mic Cullen</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mic Cullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10449</guid>
		<description>Too funny :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10448</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10448</guid>
		<description>At least it made me giggle a little bit.

I&#039;ve run IE8 a couple of times when i do a clean install, and always come running back to Firefox. 


For the regular, nontechnical user, the chart is misleading enough to keep them from moving to an alternative browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it made me giggle a little bit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve run IE8 a couple of times when i do a clean install, and always come running back to Firefox. </p>
<p>For the regular, nontechnical user, the chart is misleading enough to keep them from moving to an alternative browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Dann</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10447</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Dann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10447</guid>
		<description>1. No love for Safari from Microsoft?

2. Personal anecdote: IE8&#039;s installation mandatory reboot locked up my laptop. That&#039;s not a comforting start for great user experience moment is it?

3. It&#039;s an awful piece of misleading by intent with a case of &quot;Oh, no, the lawyers said it wasn&#039;t misleading&quot; by design. The tick as implication that IE8 is the only one with the feature, not the one with the Microsoft declared best rank.  Privacy on Chrome exists, security on Firefox and Chrome exists, and Microsoft is being deliberate and calculated in their attempts to misdirect if not outright mislead.

Which is annoying because if IE8 is half decent, it should get the wraps and reputation from performance. They don&#039;t need to do this sort of nonsense, because all this this advert does for MS is put doubts in the minds of the commentators.  Lot of the chat I&#039;ve seen this morning is dismissing the advert, and not talking about the product. Bad message strategy by MS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. No love for Safari from Microsoft?</p>
<p>2. Personal anecdote: IE8&#8217;s installation mandatory reboot locked up my laptop. That&#8217;s not a comforting start for great user experience moment is it?</p>
<p>3. It&#8217;s an awful piece of misleading by intent with a case of &#8220;Oh, no, the lawyers said it wasn&#8217;t misleading&#8221; by design. The tick as implication that IE8 is the only one with the feature, not the one with the Microsoft declared best rank.  Privacy on Chrome exists, security on Firefox and Chrome exists, and Microsoft is being deliberate and calculated in their attempts to misdirect if not outright mislead.</p>
<p>Which is annoying because if IE8 is half decent, it should get the wraps and reputation from performance. They don&#8217;t need to do this sort of nonsense, because all this this advert does for MS is put doubts in the minds of the commentators.  Lot of the chat I&#8217;ve seen this morning is dismissing the advert, and not talking about the product. Bad message strategy by MS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ridgway</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/microsofts-browser-comparison-chart-offends-anyone-whos-ever-used-another-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-10442</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ridgway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336530#comment-10442</guid>
		<description>Microsoft insulting users who dare to use another bowser... never, it should read &quot;... arrogant, pompous, self-serving Microsoft...&quot; more like it. IE has been a very disappointing, unsafe product that has FORCED users to use something else... Europe has taught them nothing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft insulting users who dare to use another bowser&#8230; never, it should read &#8220;&#8230; arrogant, pompous, self-serving Microsoft&#8230;&#8221; more like it. IE has been a very disappointing, unsafe product that has FORCED users to use something else&#8230; Europe has taught them nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
