<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GROCERYchoice Dumped As &#8220;Not Feasible&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/grocerychoice-dumped-as-not-feasible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/grocerychoice-dumped-as-not-feasible/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:00:39 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: krzystoff</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/grocerychoice-dumped-as-not-feasible/comment-page-1/#comment-10845</link>
		<dc:creator>krzystoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336906#comment-10845</guid>
		<description>CHOICE is a small-time periodical that&#039;s under-resourced to properly manage a comprehensive website of this scale. they produce a proven, balanced, effective (albeit expensive) publication and a fairly rudimentary website of their own.  they promote themselves as an independent consumer organisation, (although they are very clearly first and foremost a commercial enterprise).  
It is probably a blessing in disguise that they didn&#039;t end up with the job.

Now all that remains is to find the corrupt officials who pocketed a sizeable chunk of that cash -- but perhaps we&#039;ll never know, just like the recent Myki fiasco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHOICE is a small-time periodical that&#8217;s under-resourced to properly manage a comprehensive website of this scale. they produce a proven, balanced, effective (albeit expensive) publication and a fairly rudimentary website of their own.  they promote themselves as an independent consumer organisation, (although they are very clearly first and foremost a commercial enterprise).<br />
It is probably a blessing in disguise that they didn&#8217;t end up with the job.</p>
<p>Now all that remains is to find the corrupt officials who pocketed a sizeable chunk of that cash &#8212; but perhaps we&#8217;ll never know, just like the recent Myki fiasco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/grocerychoice-dumped-as-not-feasible/comment-page-1/#comment-10823</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336906#comment-10823</guid>
		<description>Another example where people try to solve people/business/process issues with technology solutions. There must be cheaper, non-technology solutions if we only stopped to think about the final outcome being sought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example where people try to solve people/business/process issues with technology solutions. There must be cheaper, non-technology solutions if we only stopped to think about the final outcome being sought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kato</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/06/grocerychoice-dumped-as-not-feasible/comment-page-1/#comment-10819</link>
		<dc:creator>Kato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=336906#comment-10819</guid>
		<description>Do you mean it&#039;s demise is no loss EXCEPT for the millions of tax payer dollars pumped into it (from consulting to construction)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean it&#8217;s demise is no loss EXCEPT for the millions of tax payer dollars pumped into it (from consulting to construction)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
