<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webslug Rates Your Site&#8217;s Loading Time Against Others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/webslug-rates-your-sites-loading-time-against-others/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/webslug-rates-your-sites-loading-time-against-others/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:51:46 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: websurfer</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/webslug-rates-your-sites-loading-time-against-others/comment-page-1/#comment-6663</link>
		<dc:creator>websurfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=333738#comment-6663</guid>
		<description>not so sure this is such an accurate measurement tool.  have tried it on a bunch of sites, and think that it measures the site placed in the left hand box first.  also, if you&#039;ve recently visited a site it takes the site from the user&#039;s cache rather than from the site server</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not so sure this is such an accurate measurement tool.  have tried it on a bunch of sites, and think that it measures the site placed in the left hand box first.  also, if you&#8217;ve recently visited a site it takes the site from the user&#8217;s cache rather than from the site server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
