<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbonite Adds Remote File Access For Grabbing Backups From Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/carbonite-adds-remote-file-access-for-grabbing-backups-from-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/carbonite-adds-remote-file-access-for-grabbing-backups-from-the-web/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:35:51 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/carbonite-adds-remote-file-access-for-grabbing-backups-from-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-21311</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=334005#comment-21311</guid>
		<description>This is really odd because I use carbonite and separate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proxynetworks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;remote access software&lt;/a&gt;. If I had any idea they put this feature in I might have checked it out and been pleased, but at this point I am invested in my paid for RAS. I wonder they they would be so coy about such a, in my view, significant software upgrade,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really odd because I use carbonite and separate <a href="http://www.proxynetworks.com" rel="nofollow">remote access software</a>. If I had any idea they put this feature in I might have checked it out and been pleased, but at this point I am invested in my paid for RAS. I wonder they they would be so coy about such a, in my view, significant software upgrade,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitizenDee</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/carbonite-adds-remote-file-access-for-grabbing-backups-from-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-6940</link>
		<dc:creator>CitizenDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=334005#comment-6940</guid>
		<description>I bought a 1 TB Lacie NAS that came with a free year of Carbonite back up (a service which I was looking at getting anyway).  Turns out Carbonite can&#039;t backup off remote drives like NAS or USB too I think.  That puts it at next to useless for me and ironic given the free trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a 1 TB Lacie NAS that came with a free year of Carbonite back up (a service which I was looking at getting anyway).  Turns out Carbonite can&#8217;t backup off remote drives like NAS or USB too I think.  That puts it at next to useless for me and ironic given the free trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur K</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/carbonite-adds-remote-file-access-for-grabbing-backups-from-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-6930</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=334005#comment-6930</guid>
		<description>By default Carbonite will automatically backup for you so there is no need for a &quot;sync&quot;, unless you utilise some of its advanced features to schedule your backups at certain hours of the day or week. For most users however, they will be on auto so they should have their most up to date files online all of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By default Carbonite will automatically backup for you so there is no need for a &#8220;sync&#8221;, unless you utilise some of its advanced features to schedule your backups at certain hours of the day or week. For most users however, they will be on auto so they should have their most up to date files online all of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Coughlan</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/04/carbonite-adds-remote-file-access-for-grabbing-backups-from-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-6881</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Coughlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/?p=334005#comment-6881</guid>
		<description>I use carbonite and am happy with it. But I came across this story of carbonite having lost data back in 2007 due to faulty hard drives (and they&#039;re now suing the hard drive manufacturers). I am not suggesting that we stop using carbonite but I do think online backup should not be the only backup we have. The best online service could fail for unforeseen reasons.

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/23/online-backup-company-carbonite-loses-customers-data-blames-and-sues-suppliers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use carbonite and am happy with it. But I came across this story of carbonite having lost data back in 2007 due to faulty hard drives (and they&#8217;re now suing the hard drive manufacturers). I am not suggesting that we stop using carbonite but I do think online backup should not be the only backup we have. The best online service could fail for unforeseen reasons.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/23/online-backup-company-carbonite-loses-customers-data-blames-and-sues-suppliers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/23/online-backup-company-carbonite-loses-customers-data-blames-and-sues-suppliers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
