<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Networks Still Stalling On Digital Channels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/01/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/01/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:51:46 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spiro</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/01/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>spiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2009/01/02/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels.html#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;how could you possibly feel sorry for the networks who seem so intent on self destruction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;their programmang practices are so appalling they drive me nuts. i&#039;d rather just wait for the dvd release or heaven forbid, download the torrent - at least these are reliable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how could you possibly feel sorry for the networks who seem so intent on self destruction.</p>
<p>their programmang practices are so appalling they drive me nuts. i&#8217;d rather just wait for the dvd release or heaven forbid, download the torrent &#8211; at least these are reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/01/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels/comment-page-1/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2009/01/02/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels.html#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&gt; Last year Nine boss David Gyngell said the new channels were a &quot;tax&quot; on the networks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The networks seem to think that having more channels will make them lose money. Makes me wonder if they actually have any form of business model at all, or just started making profits by accident and are scared to change anything in case they break it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve never been less inclined to repair my antenna.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Last year Nine boss David Gyngell said the new channels were a &#8220;tax&#8221; on the networks.</p>
<p>The networks seem to think that having more channels will make them lose money. Makes me wonder if they actually have any form of business model at all, or just started making profits by accident and are scared to change anything in case they break it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been less inclined to repair my antenna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warcroft</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/01/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>warcroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2009/01/02/tv_networks_still_stalling_on_digital_channels.html#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;*sigh*&lt;br /&gt;
Why am I not surprised?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*<br />
Why am I not surprised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
