<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clean Feed Filter Would Make Law Enforcement Harder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:05:47 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mr-crash</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>mr-crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/12/09/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder.html#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m waiting for this to get implemented, then for someone to realise a prominent public official somewhere has an open wireless connection. Should be amusing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Worth noting that Telstra today said it won&#039;t be participating in this. Neither will internode. Optus will, iinet said it will, but just to show how stupid it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for this to get implemented, then for someone to realise a prominent public official somewhere has an open wireless connection. Should be amusing.</p>
<p>Worth noting that Telstra today said it won&#8217;t be participating in this. Neither will internode. Optus will, iinet said it will, but just to show how stupid it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Kidman</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/12/09/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder.html#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In that case, I guess they&#039;d better put it in the tech spec. Oh, that would require actual specifications, which are a bit thin on the ground right now!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that case, I guess they&#8217;d better put it in the tech spec. Oh, that would require actual specifications, which are a bit thin on the ground right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Seymour</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/12/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Seymour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/12/09/clean_feed_filter_would_make_law_enforcement_harder.html#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Angus,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Much as I don&#039;t like the filter - and I really don&#039;t. That one is relatively easily fixed. The proxy can add a header to requests on the way out that contains the original source IP address of the request.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angus,</p>
<p>Much as I don&#8217;t like the filter &#8211; and I really don&#8217;t. That one is relatively easily fixed. The proxy can add a header to requests on the way out that contains the original source IP address of the request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
