<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Experimental Firefox Extensions We Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:14:13 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brent Barrand</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11362</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Barrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/10/31/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2.html#comment-11362</guid>
		<description>Also a lot more then reviews will be needed to get Fasterfox Lite out of the sandbox. The lead Mozilla developers don&#039;t want it to even look like they support this addon. Not sure, but maybe if it gets enough popularity they may change there mind, but who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also a lot more then reviews will be needed to get Fasterfox Lite out of the sandbox. The lead Mozilla developers don&#8217;t want it to even look like they support this addon. Not sure, but maybe if it gets enough popularity they may change there mind, but who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Barrand</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11361</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Barrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/10/31/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2.html#comment-11361</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify about Fasterfox Lite, the Link Prefetching was not removed as that is a part of Firefox. I removed the Enhanced Prefetching from Fasterfox that forced Link Prefetching of links that had not been explicitly marked by the web sight for prefetching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify about Fasterfox Lite, the Link Prefetching was not removed as that is a part of Firefox. I removed the Enhanced Prefetching from Fasterfox that forced Link Prefetching of links that had not been explicitly marked by the web sight for prefetching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/10/31/six_experimental_firefox_extensions_we_love-2.html#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The best way to get extensions moved out of the Sandbox is to write reviews for them. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to get extensions moved out of the Sandbox is to write reviews for them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
