<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Punch Up A Photo In Under 60 Seconds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/punch_up_a_photo_in_under_60_seconds-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/punch_up_a_photo_in_under_60_seconds-2/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kristo</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/punch_up_a_photo_in_under_60_seconds-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>kristo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/10/22/punch_up_a_photo_in_under_60_seconds-2.html#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;bear in mind &#039;poo&#039;, this is a person who perceives some visual appeal in this unfortunate animal, not one with discerning taste -- perhaps Artur&#039;s warped vision sees that image as an improvement, inany case Ctrl-A followed by Ctrl-X would definitely improve it 100% more!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bear in mind &#8216;poo&#8217;, this is a person who perceives some visual appeal in this unfortunate animal, not one with discerning taste &#8212; perhaps Artur&#8217;s warped vision sees that image as an improvement, inany case Ctrl-A followed by Ctrl-X would definitely improve it 100% more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poo</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/10/punch_up_a_photo_in_under_60_seconds-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>poo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/10/22/punch_up_a_photo_in_under_60_seconds-2.html#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sorry... no really... but you can&#039;t seriously consider that second image an improvement! It&#039;s like an accidental ink blot or an &#039;artists impression&#039; of a dog. Your instructions are generally along the right lines... but the visual example is baaaaaad! Take your original, drag the &#039;new improved&#039; version over the top and release (which will copy it to the same document as a new layer. Now change your layer opacity slider to about 50%-60%&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Subtlety... it&#039;s still supposed to look like a dog yeah??!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry&#8230; no really&#8230; but you can&#8217;t seriously consider that second image an improvement! It&#8217;s like an accidental ink blot or an &#8216;artists impression&#8217; of a dog. Your instructions are generally along the right lines&#8230; but the visual example is baaaaaad! Take your original, drag the &#8216;new improved&#8217; version over the top and release (which will copy it to the same document as a new layer. Now change your layer opacity slider to about 50%-60%</p>
<p>Subtlety&#8230; it&#8217;s still supposed to look like a dog yeah??!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
