<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Watch Yourself For Better Video Chat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/09/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/09/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/09/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat/comment-page-1/#comment-2360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/09/17/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat.html#comment-2360</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is not &#039;how to act properly on tv&#039; - but &#039;why are we still thinking it&#039;s a tv?&#039; I&#039;m waiting for a system that allows you to interact with other end in such a fashion that the screen becomes invisible. You don&#039;t look at yourself in a mirror whenever you&#039;re taking to someone on the street, so why do we do it in a videoconferencing call? It&#039;s because we&#039;re taking to a TV. Get rid of it somehow, futurist inventors! See my link for an idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not &#8216;how to act properly on tv&#8217; &#8211; but &#8216;why are we still thinking it&#8217;s a tv?&#8217; I&#8217;m waiting for a system that allows you to interact with other end in such a fashion that the screen becomes invisible. You don&#8217;t look at yourself in a mirror whenever you&#8217;re taking to someone on the street, so why do we do it in a videoconferencing call? It&#8217;s because we&#8217;re taking to a TV. Get rid of it somehow, futurist inventors! See my link for an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/09/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat/comment-page-1/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/09/17/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat.html#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but this is a bad idea. I prefer having the video image of myself up on the screen because it allows me to make sure my body language and facial expressions are in check. I just drag my camera feed to the top of the screen, under the webcam, and gase longingly into my own eyes. Makes for great conversations.... Wow, who&#039;s that sexy dude in the river there!?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but this is a bad idea. I prefer having the video image of myself up on the screen because it allows me to make sure my body language and facial expressions are in check. I just drag my camera feed to the top of the screen, under the webcam, and gase longingly into my own eyes. Makes for great conversations&#8230;. Wow, who&#8217;s that sexy dude in the river there!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/09/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/09/17/dont_watch_yourself_for_better_video_chat.html#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Because there&#039;s so much convergence and shake out happening in the video conference / collaboration sector at the moment, what we really need is a set of industry best practice guidelines from the key players such as Cisco, Tandberg and Polycom which sets out the way that organisations *should* deploy VC. This would really help to push the sector forward. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because there&#8217;s so much convergence and shake out happening in the video conference / collaboration sector at the moment, what we really need is a set of industry best practice guidelines from the key players such as Cisco, Tandberg and Polycom which sets out the way that organisations *should* deploy VC. This would really help to push the sector forward. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
