<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimem Reduces the Memory Footprint of Unwieldy Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/minimem_reduces_the_memory_footprint_of_unwieldy_applications-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/minimem_reduces_the_memory_footprint_of_unwieldy_applications-2/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/minimem_reduces_the_memory_footprint_of_unwieldy_applications-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/08/minimem_reduces_the_memory_footprint_of_unwieldy_applications-2.html#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would doubt the usefulness of this program. It will indeed decrease  the memory footprint of running applications. But Windows already does this when RAM is required for other purposes. And the methods it uses are far more efficient then any 3rd party program could possibly attain. Windows has access to many data structures and functions that are simply not available outside the system. The means available to any application, no matter how well written, are crude in comparison.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The memory management systems of XP and Vista are very good. There is no need or benefit in interfering with it&#039;s operation. The faults that may exist can not be fixed by any external program or service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Larry Miller&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft MCSA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would doubt the usefulness of this program. It will indeed decrease  the memory footprint of running applications. But Windows already does this when RAM is required for other purposes. And the methods it uses are far more efficient then any 3rd party program could possibly attain. Windows has access to many data structures and functions that are simply not available outside the system. The means available to any application, no matter how well written, are crude in comparison.</p>
<p>The memory management systems of XP and Vista are very good. There is no need or benefit in interfering with it&#8217;s operation. The faults that may exist can not be fixed by any external program or service.</p>
<p>Larry Miller<br />
Microsoft MCSA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello`</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/minimem_reduces_the_memory_footprint_of_unwieldy_applications-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Hello`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/08/minimem_reduces_the_memory_footprint_of_unwieldy_applications-2.html#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like it decreases usage, but doesn&#039;t change the performance gauge of the windows taskmanager.  Does this really work?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it decreases usage, but doesn&#8217;t change the performance gauge of the windows taskmanager.  Does this really work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
