<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to survive flying with other people&#8217;s kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:48:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/comment-page-1/#comment-12334</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/26/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids.html#comment-12334</guid>
		<description>I spent 12 hours from Frankfurt -&gt; Bangkok with a lady with a crying baby. I was seated in the row in front of the exit area, so the lady thought, instead of waking my family, I will move to the area at the exit row and hold my crying kid here, every 20 minutes, so no sleep this time.
2 hours later I boarded a plane from Bangkok -&gt; Brisbane (14 hours with a Sydney stopover) and some delightful parents (2x couples, 6 kids) thought they would let their kids 5 and under SCREAM and climb over chairs the whole way. A poor other lady was stuck on the end row of the kids and they carried on, so no sleep again. And a Dad thought he would bounce his toddler son on his knee until the child SCREAMED with delight. All well and good at home but on a full planeload, not so good. No earphones could have helped drain out those terrors. I am all for family zones on planes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent 12 hours from Frankfurt -&gt; Bangkok with a lady with a crying baby. I was seated in the row in front of the exit area, so the lady thought, instead of waking my family, I will move to the area at the exit row and hold my crying kid here, every 20 minutes, so no sleep this time.<br />
2 hours later I boarded a plane from Bangkok -&gt; Brisbane (14 hours with a Sydney stopover) and some delightful parents (2x couples, 6 kids) thought they would let their kids 5 and under SCREAM and climb over chairs the whole way. A poor other lady was stuck on the end row of the kids and they carried on, so no sleep again. And a Dad thought he would bounce his toddler son on his knee until the child SCREAMED with delight. All well and good at home but on a full planeload, not so good. No earphones could have helped drain out those terrors. I am all for family zones on planes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnl</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/comment-page-1/#comment-2681</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/26/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids.html#comment-2681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Put the children in the hold !!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put the children in the hold !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/comment-page-1/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/26/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids.html#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lumping children together in one small section isn&#039;t the solution. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, if I&#039;m travelling and there&#039;s a fractious child nearby there&#039;s a part of me that&#039;s going to wish they were further away. BUT I never wish for the child to be lumped in a group with a whole bunch of other [potentially or actually] fractious children and babies. That just compounds the problem for everybody, including the children and parents as well as those nearby - and let&#039;s be honest, on a plane someone is always going to be nearby.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That segregation approach is particularly challenging for parents of well-behaved older children (8 to 13 range). One of my relatives was once automatically relegated to a child section on check-in because she had a 9-year-old and an 11-year-old with her. They&#039;re well-behaved, quiet kids and experienced travellers. They wouldn&#039;t have caused anyone any grief. Instead they had to endure 4 hours up the back of the plane right near three or four babies, who managed to set each other off with their crying. They had a miserable time and they didn&#039;t deserve that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe in the divide and conquer rule. Unrelated children, especially if under 5, should be seated a minimum distance AWAY from each other, so that parents only have to worry about the behaviour of their own children and so they can have a fighting chance of achieving the nirvana of a settled baby.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lumping children together in one small section isn&#8217;t the solution. </p>
<p>Of course, if I&#8217;m travelling and there&#8217;s a fractious child nearby there&#8217;s a part of me that&#8217;s going to wish they were further away. BUT I never wish for the child to be lumped in a group with a whole bunch of other [potentially or actually] fractious children and babies. That just compounds the problem for everybody, including the children and parents as well as those nearby &#8211; and let&#8217;s be honest, on a plane someone is always going to be nearby.</p>
<p>That segregation approach is particularly challenging for parents of well-behaved older children (8 to 13 range). One of my relatives was once automatically relegated to a child section on check-in because she had a 9-year-old and an 11-year-old with her. They&#8217;re well-behaved, quiet kids and experienced travellers. They wouldn&#8217;t have caused anyone any grief. Instead they had to endure 4 hours up the back of the plane right near three or four babies, who managed to set each other off with their crying. They had a miserable time and they didn&#8217;t deserve that.</p>
<p>I believe in the divide and conquer rule. Unrelated children, especially if under 5, should be seated a minimum distance AWAY from each other, so that parents only have to worry about the behaviour of their own children and so they can have a fighting chance of achieving the nirvana of a settled baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/26/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids.html#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Question: any tips for parents travelling internationally with kids &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: any tips for parents travelling internationally with kids </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekkonaut</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/08/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids/comment-page-1/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator>gekkonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/08/26/how_to_survive_flying_with_other_peoples_kids.html#comment-2678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can we have less obviousness please!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we have less obviousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
