<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Best Alternative File Managers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wobble</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11182</link>
		<dc:creator>Wobble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/07/25/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2.html#comment-11182</guid>
		<description>Which File Manager is good for Windows7 64bit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which File Manager is good for Windows7 64bit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Piper</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/07/25/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2.html#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article. I&#039;ve tried all of them and found Directory Opus to be the most competent and best of them all. So I bought it. Just a note, the developer is Australian and so is the price - Australian $85. I paid US$53.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I&#8217;ve tried all of them and found Directory Opus to be the most competent and best of them all. So I bought it. Just a note, the developer is Australian and so is the price &#8211; Australian $85. I paid US$53.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3073</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/07/25/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2.html#comment-3073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Powerdesk Pro for sure.  You can do a search for file content and see it in context.  E.g You want to search your docs for &quot;marketing principles&quot;.  You can shoose to have about 10 words either side of your search come up as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Powerdesk Pro for sure.  You can do a search for file content and see it in context.  E.g You want to search your docs for &#8220;marketing principles&#8221;.  You can shoose to have about 10 words either side of your search come up as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idodialog</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>idodialog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/07/25/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2.html#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use a file manager a lot. Most of the tasks are routine. I like access to more than one folder at once. The visual prop helps me. Built in FTP seems obvious and necessary. Tabs is a natural for multiple folders. Most of these file managers simplify tasks by smart design and clever integration. &lt;br /&gt;
XYplorer wins over xplorer2 with its powerful info bar, catalog, adaptability, speed and stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Xplorer2 pro comes a very close second - fast clean and full featured - pretty well no learning curve (and its got scraps which is a great tool). &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a file manager a lot. Most of the tasks are routine. I like access to more than one folder at once. The visual prop helps me. Built in FTP seems obvious and necessary. Tabs is a natural for multiple folders. Most of these file managers simplify tasks by smart design and clever integration. <br />
XYplorer wins over xplorer2 with its powerful info bar, catalog, adaptability, speed and stability.<br />
Xplorer2 pro comes a very close second &#8211; fast clean and full featured &#8211; pretty well no learning curve (and its got scraps which is a great tool). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/07/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/07/25/five_best_alternative_file_managers-2.html#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly - all these people saying they don&#039;t need alternative file managers are just wasting space and creating white noise for people that really wnat to hear about them.  Why post a comment under ANY &#039;best of&#039; list of you don&#039;t use the app/function being discussed?  I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s an attempt to be &#039;old school&#039; or &#039;zen&#039; but in reality it&#039;s pointless.  For my vote - XYPlorer has so many advanced features that it is a real time saver, even if the elarning curve is steep.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly &#8211; all these people saying they don&#8217;t need alternative file managers are just wasting space and creating white noise for people that really wnat to hear about them.  Why post a comment under ANY &#8216;best of&#8217; list of you don&#8217;t use the app/function being discussed?  I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s an attempt to be &#8216;old school&#8217; or &#8216;zen&#8217; but in reality it&#8217;s pointless.  For my vote &#8211; XYPlorer has so many advanced features that it is a real time saver, even if the elarning curve is steep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
