<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beating Kevin Rudd&#8217;s Facebook ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/06/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/06/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban/</link>
	<description>tips and downloads to help you at work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angus Kidman</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/06/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban/comment-page-1/#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Kidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/06/02/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban.html#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The specific phrase that got me going was actually &quot;take down their Facebook websites&quot; -- there&#039;s only one Facebook site, which has lots of pages. It&#039;s a pretty common media error, and a stupid one given how many people use Facebook. Replace &quot;sites&quot; with &quot;profiles&quot; or &quot;pages&quot; and it&#039;s fine. Newspapers face a challenge in attracting younger readers, and I don&#039;t think this kind of approach does &#039;em any favours!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specific phrase that got me going was actually &#8220;take down their Facebook websites&#8221; &#8212; there&#8217;s only one Facebook site, which has lots of pages. It&#8217;s a pretty common media error, and a stupid one given how many people use Facebook. Replace &#8220;sites&#8221; with &#8220;profiles&#8221; or &#8220;pages&#8221; and it&#8217;s fine. Newspapers face a challenge in attracting younger readers, and I don&#8217;t think this kind of approach does &#8216;em any favours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phraedus</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/06/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban/comment-page-1/#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>phraedus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/06/02/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban.html#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Angus: Why is the phrase &#039;facebook site&#039; annoying?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep up the unique Australian posts, it&#039;s bringing much more relevance to visiting this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Angus: Why is the phrase &#8216;facebook site&#8217; annoying?</p>
<p>Keep up the unique Australian posts, it&#8217;s bringing much more relevance to visiting this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2008/06/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban/comment-page-1/#comment-3788</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2008/06/02/beating_kevin_rudds_facebook_ban.html#comment-3788</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;depending on how sophisticated your filters are, www.beta.facebook.com often lets you get access to the same features as the regular site (today it&#039;s redirecting to www.facebook.com though)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;same goes for individual application areas, since they go through http://apps.facebook.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depending on how sophisticated your filters are, <a href="http://www.beta.facebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.beta.facebook.com</a> often lets you get access to the same features as the regular site (today it&#8217;s redirecting to <a href="http://www.facebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com</a> though)</p>
<p>same goes for individual application areas, since they go through <a href="http://apps.facebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://apps.facebook.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
