Do You Shoot in RAW?

Whether you’re a weekend photographer or seasoned professional, Wired’s Charlie Sorrel says you should always use your digital camera’s RAW setting—no excuses. Sorrel cites increased dynamic range, no in-camera processing of the image, and full reign to adjust the results using all of the pre-compressed, raw data available in the image (hence RAW). The downsides to RAW, on the other hand, include slower capture times, larger files, and lack of support on lower-end consumer cameras. (Then again, if you’ve got a Canon point-and-shoot, there’s a good chance you can add RAW support and other high-end features by installing the easy-to-use Canon Hackers Development Kit.) Wired’s recommendation is one thing, but we’re curious what mode you regularly shoot in. So we want to know:

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you’re viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.


Despite the benefits of RAW, another downside for many hobbyist photographers is time required to get good results. If you’re not someone who enjoys post-processing photographs, taking advantage of RAW’s flexibility may seem like more of a pain than a benefit. But if you want to get the most from your digital photos, RAW mode is a must. Let’s hear more about why you do or don’t shoot RAW in the comments. Photo by Neil Cowburn.

Comments (AU Comments | US Comments)

    There are currently no AU comments for this post.

Post Your Comments

Got something to say? There are two ways to comment:

1. Guests

Click here to comment instantly.

2. Facebook Users

Click below to comment using your Facebook account.

We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial or highly amusing. If your comments are excessively self-promotional, obnoxious, or even worse, boring, you will be banned from commenting. All comments are moderated.