Comments on: How Many Lifehacker Posts Do You Want Per Day?

By: Jamie

Jamie — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:09:23 +0000

Less cross-pollination between the Gawker blogs would be nice. It’s annoying to see the same post come up on LH, LHA, Gizmodo, etc, etc. Sometimes I will see a post 4 times, and it’s like… W T F? Why have seperate blogs at all if they are all just going to be the same content? Yet, there is just enough difference that you can’t just follow one. Grrr.

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:40:17 +0000

Filter out all the American ones! (but make a note so that you blog about them when they’re available in Australia)

By: Simon

Simon — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:07:56 +0000

The post count is about right, but one thing that does irritate me is the non-specific nature of post headlines. The other day a post was titled ‘Guardian’… thats all. So what could it have been about? an article about PeerGuardian? Some new piece of security software? No.. it was about the Guardian Newspaper’s List of Top 50 Most Influential Blogs. Why couldn’t that be put in the headline? As it stands at the moment, it can be very frustrating for readers who follow the blog in an RSS accumulator.

By: susan rattray

susan rattray — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:38:40 +0000

i think 10-15 is about right. Do not have time or inclination for more, per day.

By: Shane

Shane — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:15:13 +0000

I find there’s more posts than I can keep up with. If we can’t have less posts, can we at least filter out all the explicit US-specific ones from the AU feed?

By: Dana

Dana — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:29:44 +0000

I have found that the quality of posts have been lacking of late. I would prefer a few really good posts.

By: Arwen

Arwen — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:12:53 +0000

I do tend to find there are more posts than I have time to read. Of course, not all of them are going to be relevant to me anyway, but a few less would give me a greater chance of actually reading the relevant ones.