http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2007/11/synchronize_folders_with_synct/ tips and downloads to help you at work and play Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:35:51 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2007/11/synchronize_folders_with_synct/comment-page-1/#comment-5492 Nick Randolph Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:42:10 +0000 http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2007/11/28/synchronize_folders_with_synct.html#comment-5492 <p>I haven't installed it - does it actually require SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (SSCE) as a prerequisite, or does it come bundled with it. If it is the former then they need to reconsider their deployment options. SSCE is definitely the right option for this type of application but should imho be deployed alongside the application as a set of dlls (SSCE doesn't require installation as such to run since it runs in-process with the application using it).</p> I haven’t installed it – does it actually require SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (SSCE) as a prerequisite, or does it come bundled with it. If it is the former then they need to reconsider their deployment options. SSCE is definitely the right option for this type of application but should imho be deployed alongside the application as a set of dlls (SSCE doesn’t require installation as such to run since it runs in-process with the application using it).

]]> http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2007/11/synchronize_folders_with_synct/comment-page-1/#comment-5491 reinis Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:30:40 +0000 http://www.lifehacker.com.au/tips/2007/11/28/synchronize_folders_with_synct.html#comment-5491 <p>It's a shame that SyncToy needs SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition as a pre-requisite. It's also pretty silly that it can't use SQL Server 2005 Enterprise which I already have installed on my machine. Perhaps this might be fixed when it exits beta?</p> It’s a shame that SyncToy needs SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition as a pre-requisite. It’s also pretty silly that it can’t use SQL Server 2005 Enterprise which I already have installed on my machine. Perhaps this might be fixed when it exits beta?

]]>